Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation
Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a symptom commonly presented to GPs, accounting for a significant proportion of their workload. It is also a common reason for sickness absence, and thus of national economic importance.
Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to provide an understanding of how GPs understood CLBP, how they approached the consultation with CLBP patients and how they conceptualized the management of this problem.
Method: Qualitative research techniques were employed. Twenty GPs working in North-West England were interviewed. Interviews were semi-structured and recorded on audio-tape. Transcripts of these interviews were then subjected to constant comparative qualitative analysis.
Results: Subjects described their difficulties in responding to and managing CLBP. They acknowledged the link between CLBP and psychological distress, and that it legitimizes long-standing illness behaviour. They were pessimistic about the chances for successful cure or palliation of CLBP.
Conclusion: Subjects seemed to be cognisant of collusion between doctor and patient, in cases where the patient's explanatory model of back pain is not challenged. We argue that this can be accounted for by the patient operating within a physical model of pain causation, while doctors operate using a model that stresses psychosocial factors. The incommensurability of these models lies at the root of the CLBP consultation as a problem.
chronic low back pain, doctor–patient relationship, illness behaviour, sickness absence
46-49
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
530beade-2b1c-4eea-846f-1fcef0585ca5
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
February 1999
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
530beade-2b1c-4eea-846f-1fcef0585ca5
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Chew-Graham, Carolyn and May, Carl
(1999)
Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation.
Family Practice, 16 (1), .
(doi:10.1093/fampra/16.1.46).
Abstract
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a symptom commonly presented to GPs, accounting for a significant proportion of their workload. It is also a common reason for sickness absence, and thus of national economic importance.
Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to provide an understanding of how GPs understood CLBP, how they approached the consultation with CLBP patients and how they conceptualized the management of this problem.
Method: Qualitative research techniques were employed. Twenty GPs working in North-West England were interviewed. Interviews were semi-structured and recorded on audio-tape. Transcripts of these interviews were then subjected to constant comparative qualitative analysis.
Results: Subjects described their difficulties in responding to and managing CLBP. They acknowledged the link between CLBP and psychological distress, and that it legitimizes long-standing illness behaviour. They were pessimistic about the chances for successful cure or palliation of CLBP.
Conclusion: Subjects seemed to be cognisant of collusion between doctor and patient, in cases where the patient's explanatory model of back pain is not challenged. We argue that this can be accounted for by the patient operating within a physical model of pain causation, while doctors operate using a model that stresses psychosocial factors. The incommensurability of these models lies at the root of the CLBP consultation as a problem.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 1999
Keywords:
chronic low back pain, doctor–patient relationship, illness behaviour, sickness absence
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163653
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163653
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 8cb6f606-c356-40f5-ba61-3acdda06fc39
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Sep 2010 09:29
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Author:
Carl May
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics