Is objective testing for menorrhagia in general practice practical?: results from a qualitative study
Is objective testing for menorrhagia in general practice practical?: results from a qualitative study
Objectives: to explore the interpretative character of medical knowledge and the way that clinicians respond to the patient's assertion that her menstrual blood loss is excessive. In particular, we are interested in the boundary between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’, and whether or not general practitioners would consider conducting objective tests for menorrhagia in their surgeries. We also wanted to explore the extent to which clinicians pay attention to women's subjective accounts of ‘heavy’ menstrual blood loss when making a diagnosis. The consequences of making a distinction between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ blood loss may be considerable. A diagnosis of menorrhagia may crucially affect quality of life, morbidity and mortality.
Method: qualitative study using 73 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners in Northwest England.
Results: two thirds of the respondents indicated that they seriously attempt an assessment of menstrual blood loss, while one third of the respondents appeared to pay more attention to the women's subjective assessment of unacceptable ‘heavy’ bleeding. Some general practitioners had a very negative attitude to menstrual blood. Very few would consider conducting objective tests for menstrual blood loss if such tests involved the collection of soiled pads and tampons. However, about half of the respondents thought that a pictorial chart might be useful when trying to estimate menstrual blood loss.
Conclusion: since general practitioners are not in agreement about the manner in which women's complaints of heavy bleeding should be assessed, evidence-based clinical guidelines that deal with both ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ menorrhagia are timely
menorrhagia, general practitioner, diagnosis, primary care
13-17
Chappie, Alison
7a848af8-a38c-4a23-aa66-b8c79379a03b
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Ling, Margaret
b2a8dd1a-9529-4be1-9333-6f288e7c8e10
2001
Chappie, Alison
7a848af8-a38c-4a23-aa66-b8c79379a03b
May, Carl
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Ling, Margaret
b2a8dd1a-9529-4be1-9333-6f288e7c8e10
Chappie, Alison, May, Carl and Ling, Margaret
(2001)
Is objective testing for menorrhagia in general practice practical?: results from a qualitative study.
European Journal of General Practice, 7 (1), .
(doi:10.3109/13814780109048778).
Abstract
Objectives: to explore the interpretative character of medical knowledge and the way that clinicians respond to the patient's assertion that her menstrual blood loss is excessive. In particular, we are interested in the boundary between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’, and whether or not general practitioners would consider conducting objective tests for menorrhagia in their surgeries. We also wanted to explore the extent to which clinicians pay attention to women's subjective accounts of ‘heavy’ menstrual blood loss when making a diagnosis. The consequences of making a distinction between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ blood loss may be considerable. A diagnosis of menorrhagia may crucially affect quality of life, morbidity and mortality.
Method: qualitative study using 73 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners in Northwest England.
Results: two thirds of the respondents indicated that they seriously attempt an assessment of menstrual blood loss, while one third of the respondents appeared to pay more attention to the women's subjective assessment of unacceptable ‘heavy’ bleeding. Some general practitioners had a very negative attitude to menstrual blood. Very few would consider conducting objective tests for menstrual blood loss if such tests involved the collection of soiled pads and tampons. However, about half of the respondents thought that a pictorial chart might be useful when trying to estimate menstrual blood loss.
Conclusion: since general practitioners are not in agreement about the manner in which women's complaints of heavy bleeding should be assessed, evidence-based clinical guidelines that deal with both ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ menorrhagia are timely
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2001
Keywords:
menorrhagia, general practitioner, diagnosis, primary care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 163669
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163669
ISSN: 1381-4788
PURE UUID: a344b8e9-4565-400a-a5c0-b0d95f0d2b50
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Sep 2010 13:46
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alison Chappie
Author:
Carl May
Author:
Margaret Ling
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics