The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is objective testing for menorrhagia in general practice practical?: results from a qualitative study

Chappie, Alison, May, Carl and Ling, Margaret (2001) Is objective testing for menorrhagia in general practice practical?: results from a qualitative study European Journal of General Practice, 7, (1), pp. 13-17. (doi:10.3109/13814780109048778).

Record type: Article


Objectives: to explore the interpretative character of medical knowledge and the way that clinicians respond to the patient's assertion that her menstrual blood loss is excessive. In particular, we are interested in the boundary between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’, and whether or not general practitioners would consider conducting objective tests for menorrhagia in their surgeries. We also wanted to explore the extent to which clinicians pay attention to women's subjective accounts of ‘heavy’ menstrual blood loss when making a diagnosis. The consequences of making a distinction between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ blood loss may be considerable. A diagnosis of menorrhagia may crucially affect quality of life, morbidity and mortality.

Method: qualitative study using 73 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners in Northwest England.

Results: two thirds of the respondents indicated that they seriously attempt an assessment of menstrual blood loss, while one third of the respondents appeared to pay more attention to the women's subjective assessment of unacceptable ‘heavy’ bleeding. Some general practitioners had a very negative attitude to menstrual blood. Very few would consider conducting objective tests for menstrual blood loss if such tests involved the collection of soiled pads and tampons. However, about half of the respondents thought that a pictorial chart might be useful when trying to estimate menstrual blood loss.

Conclusion: since general practitioners are not in agreement about the manner in which women's complaints of heavy bleeding should be assessed, evidence-based clinical guidelines that deal with both ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ menorrhagia are timely

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: menorrhagia, general practitioner, diagnosis, primary care


Local EPrints ID: 163669
ISSN: 1381-4788
PURE UUID: a344b8e9-4565-400a-a5c0-b0d95f0d2b50
ORCID for Carl May: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2010 13:46
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:30

Export record



Author: Alison Chappie
Author: Carl May ORCID iD
Author: Margaret Ling

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.