The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The burden of depression in primary care: a qualitative investigation of general practitioners' constructs of depressed people in the inner city

The burden of depression in primary care: a qualitative investigation of general practitioners' constructs of depressed people in the inner city
The burden of depression in primary care: a qualitative investigation of general practitioners' constructs of depressed people in the inner city
Depression is a common problem, often being recurrent or becoming chronic. It has been stated that people with depression should continue to be predominantly managed in primary care. There is much evidence to suggest that the detection and management of depression by general practitioners (GPs) could be improved, but little work has focused on GPs' views on their work with depressed patients. This was a qualitative study exploring GPs' attitudes to the management of patients with depression. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs in north-west England. These GPs were practising in urban or inner-city areas and were all based in practices that participated in undergraduate teaching. The interviews were audiotaped and subsequently transcribed. Analysis was by constant comparison until category saturation was achieved. The subjects conceptualized depression as an everyday problem of practice rather than as an objective diagnostic category. Thematic coding of their accounts suggested a tension between three kinds of views of depressed people, namely (1) that depression is a common and normal response to socioeconomic disadvantage and that it reflects the medicalization of these conditions, (2) that the diagnosis of depression offers a degree of secondary gain to both patients and doctors and (3) that GPs experienced depressed people as an intractable interactional problem. It was concluded that depression is commonly presented to GPs who feel that its diagnosis often involves the separation of a normal reaction to a harsh environment and true illness. In addition, they felt ill-equipped to deal with the long-term management of such patients. They doubted that anything therapeutic occurs in review consultations with such patients. This has an important implication for the construction of educational interventions around improving the recognition and treatment of depression in primary care: doctors may be reluctant to recognize and respond to such patients in depth because of the much wider structural and social factors that we have suggested in this paper.
depression, primary, care, sick, role
1365-1501
137-141
Chew-Graham, C.A.
281b6aac-aac5-4a75-b05d-d8997ef470ca
May, C.R.
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Cole, H.
29d57992-20e7-4777-bf3f-8441b6a45140
Hedley, S.
123629e3-de78-46b7-a44b-925cb98dedb4
Chew-Graham, C.A.
281b6aac-aac5-4a75-b05d-d8997ef470ca
May, C.R.
17697f8d-98f6-40d3-9cc0-022f04009ae4
Cole, H.
29d57992-20e7-4777-bf3f-8441b6a45140
Hedley, S.
123629e3-de78-46b7-a44b-925cb98dedb4

Chew-Graham, C.A., May, C.R., Cole, H. and Hedley, S. (2000) The burden of depression in primary care: a qualitative investigation of general practitioners' constructs of depressed people in the inner city. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 6 (4), 137-141.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Depression is a common problem, often being recurrent or becoming chronic. It has been stated that people with depression should continue to be predominantly managed in primary care. There is much evidence to suggest that the detection and management of depression by general practitioners (GPs) could be improved, but little work has focused on GPs' views on their work with depressed patients. This was a qualitative study exploring GPs' attitudes to the management of patients with depression. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs in north-west England. These GPs were practising in urban or inner-city areas and were all based in practices that participated in undergraduate teaching. The interviews were audiotaped and subsequently transcribed. Analysis was by constant comparison until category saturation was achieved. The subjects conceptualized depression as an everyday problem of practice rather than as an objective diagnostic category. Thematic coding of their accounts suggested a tension between three kinds of views of depressed people, namely (1) that depression is a common and normal response to socioeconomic disadvantage and that it reflects the medicalization of these conditions, (2) that the diagnosis of depression offers a degree of secondary gain to both patients and doctors and (3) that GPs experienced depressed people as an intractable interactional problem. It was concluded that depression is commonly presented to GPs who feel that its diagnosis often involves the separation of a normal reaction to a harsh environment and true illness. In addition, they felt ill-equipped to deal with the long-term management of such patients. They doubted that anything therapeutic occurs in review consultations with such patients. This has an important implication for the construction of educational interventions around improving the recognition and treatment of depression in primary care: doctors may be reluctant to recognize and respond to such patients in depth because of the much wider structural and social factors that we have suggested in this paper.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1 December 2000
Keywords: depression, primary, care, sick, role

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 163745
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/163745
ISSN: 1365-1501
PURE UUID: 40d5746f-b46b-419e-89d3-023a46429d15
ORCID for C.R. May: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-2690

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Sep 2010 11:25
Last modified: 06 Jun 2018 12:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: C.A. Chew-Graham
Author: C.R. May ORCID iD
Author: H. Cole
Author: S. Hedley

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×