MIxtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants for wet-cleaning historic textiles: a preliminary evaluation with standard soiled wool and cotton test fabrics
MIxtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants for wet-cleaning historic textiles: a preliminary evaluation with standard soiled wool and cotton test fabrics
An investigation undertaken in 1995-96 is reported. An international survey of textile conservators found that there was no substantial reason why mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants which industry and theory show to be more effective than single types are not used in conservation. Experiments using mixtures of the surfactants including those found to be the most commonly used in textile conservation were carried out to compare the effectiveness of these against single use. These experiments used wool and cotton standard soiled test fabrics to compare the soil removal effects (measured by changes in 'colour' [CIE L* a* b* values]) of two non-ionics (Synperonic N and a possible substitute, Synperonic A5), one anionic (sodium dodecyl sulphate [SDS], equivalent to Orvus WA paste), and two mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants (one commercial mixture, Berol 784, and one custom-made mixture of Synperonic A5 and SDS). Results showed that the latter mixture achieved optimal cleaning on the wool test fabrics, when used as follows: 1 ml Synperonic A5, 0.1 ml SDS, 0.01g sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, 999 ml deionised water for every litre of wash liquor. The test results on cotton were inconclusive.
anionic, non-ionic, surfactants, wet cleaning, textiles
73-89
Eastop, D.D.M.
c4825cd3-784e-4035-9be9-958f0a60b5f0
Lewis, J.
b044562a-3f09-4fcf-8730-9bd21f63d1ad
2001
Eastop, D.D.M.
c4825cd3-784e-4035-9be9-958f0a60b5f0
Lewis, J.
b044562a-3f09-4fcf-8730-9bd21f63d1ad
Eastop, D.D.M. and Lewis, J.
(2001)
MIxtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants for wet-cleaning historic textiles: a preliminary evaluation with standard soiled wool and cotton test fabrics.
The Conservator, (25), .
Abstract
An investigation undertaken in 1995-96 is reported. An international survey of textile conservators found that there was no substantial reason why mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants which industry and theory show to be more effective than single types are not used in conservation. Experiments using mixtures of the surfactants including those found to be the most commonly used in textile conservation were carried out to compare the effectiveness of these against single use. These experiments used wool and cotton standard soiled test fabrics to compare the soil removal effects (measured by changes in 'colour' [CIE L* a* b* values]) of two non-ionics (Synperonic N and a possible substitute, Synperonic A5), one anionic (sodium dodecyl sulphate [SDS], equivalent to Orvus WA paste), and two mixtures of anionic and non-ionic surfactants (one commercial mixture, Berol 784, and one custom-made mixture of Synperonic A5 and SDS). Results showed that the latter mixture achieved optimal cleaning on the wool test fabrics, when used as follows: 1 ml Synperonic A5, 0.1 ml SDS, 0.01g sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, 999 ml deionised water for every litre of wash liquor. The test results on cotton were inconclusive.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2001
Keywords:
anionic, non-ionic, surfactants, wet cleaning, textiles
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 16384
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/16384
ISSN: 0140-0096
PURE UUID: 42a4b4d1-d701-4458-bd62-d8b69dabb95f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2005
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 14:06
Export record
Contributors
Author:
D.D.M. Eastop
Author:
J. Lewis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics