The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Outcomes in patients on home haemodialysis in England and Wales, 1997–2005: a comparative cohort analysis

Nitsch, Dorothea, Steenkamp, Retha, Tomson, Charles R.V., Roderick, Paul, Ansell, David and MacGregor, Mark S. (2011) Outcomes in patients on home haemodialysis in England and Wales, 1997–2005: a comparative cohort analysis Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 26, (5), pp. 1670-1677. (doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq561).

Record type: Article


Background: The UK national policy promotes expansion of home haemodialysis, but there are no recent data on characteristics and outcomes of a national home haemodialysis population.

Methods: We compared incident home haemodialysis patients in England and Wales (n = 225, 1997–2005) with age- and sex-matched incident peritoneal dialysis, hospital haemodialysis and satellite haemodialysis patients with follow-up until 31 December 2006. Cox regression analyses included time-dependent changes of wait-listing for transplantation (a proxy for health status), start of home haemodialysis and transplantation.

Results: There was a median delay of 12 months between starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) and home haemodialysis. During that first year of RRT, >?50% of home haemodialysis patients were wait-listed for kidney transplantation; hospital haemodialysis patients had a lower rate of wait-listing over time [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.70; P < 0.001]. In crude analyses, there was a marked survival advantage of home haemodialysis patients compared with other modalities (log-rank P-value < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, being on home haemodialysis yielded a long-term survival benefit compared with peritoneal dialysis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.93), and a borderline advantage compared with hospital haemodialysis (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.03). There was no evidence of an advantage compared with satellite haemodialysis (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65–1.37).

Conclusions: Home haemodialysis patients have better survival compared with other dialysis modalities. Some of this crude survival advantage is due to selection of a healthier patient cohort as evidenced by higher transplant wait-listing rates. The advantage over peritoneal dialysis persisted after adjustment for wait-listing and transplantation over time.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 September 2010
Published date: 2011
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences


Local EPrints ID: 164113
ISSN: 0931-0509
PURE UUID: e4ae0ff1-3953-430e-a982-9166a09ee5c6
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Sep 2010 09:27
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:29

Export record



Author: Dorothea Nitsch
Author: Retha Steenkamp
Author: Charles R.V. Tomson
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: David Ansell
Author: Mark S. MacGregor

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.