The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Clinical criteria for evidence-based treatment of laryngitis and benign laryngeal neoplasms

Clinical criteria for evidence-based treatment of laryngitis and benign laryngeal neoplasms
Clinical criteria for evidence-based treatment of laryngitis and benign laryngeal neoplasms
Introduction: In a European Position Paper (EPP), Fokkens et al (1) have considered the evidence based literature on mucosal function in rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (as parts of the upper airways). An attempt has been made to do the same in laryngology.

Method: The search method in the literature includes: A definition of disorders and thereafter a description of: Epidemiology and predisposing factors. Inflammatory mechanisms in acute and chronic disorders. Bases for diagnoses including acoustical evaluation. Considerations for management. Special consideration in children. Relation to lower airways. Socio-economic costs. Outcome measures in evidence based research. Needs and priorities.

Results of preliminary search of literature:
1. Acoustical analyses of the voice: Acoustical analyses compared with listeners tests were evaluated in a statistical meta-analysis (2) with the conclusion that caution is warranted regarding the concurrent validity of measures. The clinical utility of many measures commonly used to analyse sustained tones as well as continuous speech were not found to be sufficiently evidence based for inclusion in the referred analysis.
2. Singers and speakers: In singers, a review was made of definitions and treatment of disorders (3). No evidence based studies have been found. Ulis and Yanagisawa (4) report a lack of large, controlled, prospective studies regarding diagnosis and management of dysphonic patients. They note, however, that high-speed digital imaging is gradually becoming a useful adjunct to stroboscopy in patients with hoarseness and aperiodicity.
3. Swallowing and respiration: Based on a Cochrane review it was shown that the swallowing process in the throat was not related to deficiency of voice function in the larynx in an evidence based way (6). Following a systematic literature review, Syed et al. (5) report that laryngopharyngeal reflux is cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor.
4. Surgery: To date, no analysis of outcomes of surgery on the vocal cords has been made using the Cochrane classification of statistical evidence. This means that there is no evidence on surgery of the vocal cords in benign disorders.

Discussion: Based on our search suggestions are made of chapters of areas where it is important to search scientific literature for evidence very carefully, especially randomized control trials (RCT), as it has been done in rhinology.
Pedersen, Mette
e2e4bdf6-4f3b-4192-93b1-dcbd50cb6230
Barney, Anna
bc0ee7f7-517a-4154-ab7d-57270de3e815
Pedersen, Mette
e2e4bdf6-4f3b-4192-93b1-dcbd50cb6230
Barney, Anna
bc0ee7f7-517a-4154-ab7d-57270de3e815

Pedersen, Mette and Barney, Anna (2010) Clinical criteria for evidence-based treatment of laryngitis and benign laryngeal neoplasms. 9th International Conference on Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Voice and Speech Research, Erlangen, Germany. 09 - 10 Sep 2010.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Introduction: In a European Position Paper (EPP), Fokkens et al (1) have considered the evidence based literature on mucosal function in rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (as parts of the upper airways). An attempt has been made to do the same in laryngology.

Method: The search method in the literature includes: A definition of disorders and thereafter a description of: Epidemiology and predisposing factors. Inflammatory mechanisms in acute and chronic disorders. Bases for diagnoses including acoustical evaluation. Considerations for management. Special consideration in children. Relation to lower airways. Socio-economic costs. Outcome measures in evidence based research. Needs and priorities.

Results of preliminary search of literature:
1. Acoustical analyses of the voice: Acoustical analyses compared with listeners tests were evaluated in a statistical meta-analysis (2) with the conclusion that caution is warranted regarding the concurrent validity of measures. The clinical utility of many measures commonly used to analyse sustained tones as well as continuous speech were not found to be sufficiently evidence based for inclusion in the referred analysis.
2. Singers and speakers: In singers, a review was made of definitions and treatment of disorders (3). No evidence based studies have been found. Ulis and Yanagisawa (4) report a lack of large, controlled, prospective studies regarding diagnosis and management of dysphonic patients. They note, however, that high-speed digital imaging is gradually becoming a useful adjunct to stroboscopy in patients with hoarseness and aperiodicity.
3. Swallowing and respiration: Based on a Cochrane review it was shown that the swallowing process in the throat was not related to deficiency of voice function in the larynx in an evidence based way (6). Following a systematic literature review, Syed et al. (5) report that laryngopharyngeal reflux is cited as a cause of hoarseness but the evidence base for treatment with gastric acid suppression is poor.
4. Surgery: To date, no analysis of outcomes of surgery on the vocal cords has been made using the Cochrane classification of statistical evidence. This means that there is no evidence on surgery of the vocal cords in benign disorders.

Discussion: Based on our search suggestions are made of chapters of areas where it is important to search scientific literature for evidence very carefully, especially randomized control trials (RCT), as it has been done in rhinology.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2010
Venue - Dates: 9th International Conference on Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Voice and Speech Research, Erlangen, Germany, 2010-09-09 - 2010-09-10
Related URLs:

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 164337
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/164337
PURE UUID: 3fb3c224-5e63-4633-9cd6-ef91cedf0076
ORCID for Anna Barney: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-1478

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Oct 2010 10:15
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 03:24

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mette Pedersen
Author: Anna Barney ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×