The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Analysis of open quotient in voiced fricative production using EGG

Analysis of open quotient in voiced fricative production using EGG
Analysis of open quotient in voiced fricative production using EGG
Introduction
Electroglottography (EGG) is a common method for providing noninvasive measurements of glottal activity. The object of this study was to characterise EGG based parameters, specifically the open quotient (OQ), during fricative production, and during the phones preceding and following the fricative in a carrier phrase. With the OQ measures we aim to quantitatively establish if the relatively weak voicing during the fricative production may be differentiated from the stronger voicing of the contextual vowel. Our long term goal is to understand the mechanisms by which voicing is initiated and maintained as a guide to improving strategies for initiating and maintaining voicing in patients with laryngeal impairment such as unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) (Pinho, Jesus, & Barney, 2009).

Methods
Data were collected from two adult female (JG and HV) and two adult male (LJ and RS) speakers of EP. None had reported speech, language or hearing disorders, and all had normal vocal qualities. They were assessed by an experienced Speech and Language Therapist using a standardised evaluation protocol (Jesus, et al., 2009). Speakers were recorded producing 51 utterances, including 9 isolated words containing the EP voiced fricatives /v, z, Z/, in initial, medial and final word position, and the same 9 words embedded in 51 different carrier sentences, that presented a variety of consonantal (taps, laterals, stops and nasals) and vocalic (close, open front and back vowels) contexts in real EP sentences (only vowel-fricative-vowel sequences were analysed). To analyse the EGG signal we built Matlab scripts based on the open source software “MOQ interface” (Henrich, Alessandro, Doval, & Castellengo, 2004; Henrich, Gendrot, Michaud, & Tuan, 2005). We used the method “DEGG DECOM”, reported as the one that presented the best results compared to OQ measurements derived from the inverse-filtered glottal flow (Henrich, et al., 2004). These functions, developed for the singing voice (Henrich, et al., 2004), assume a quasi-periodic signal and were therefore considered to be more suitable for voiced
fricative analysis. To characterise the fricatives in terms of their production mechanisms, we analysed the OQ derived from the EGG signal during the steady state of the fricative and of the adjacent vowels. The strategy used to correlate and extract information from these different modes of speech production was based on average values calculated for the OQ within phone1 (vowel), phone2 (fricative) and phone3 (vowel).

Results
We calculated for each phone (1, 2 and 3) the average of the OQ values derived from EGGDEGG. In cases where the peaks do not stand out clearly and the OQ cannot be calculated reliably, it does not make sense to talk of an OQ at all (Henrich, et al., 2005). Therefore, zero and nonsense OQ values (e.g., fundamental frequency derived from EGG, with values equal or greater than 400Hz) were not included in subsequent analysis. For both female and male data, an increase in the OQ values during fricative production (phone2) was observed when compared to OQ values from the adjacent vowels (phone1 and phone3), as shown in Table 1.

Discussion
There was a small increase in the OQ values during the fricative, relative to that of the adjacent vowels. We can hypothesise that a more physically efficient voice is related with a decrease of the OQ value during the production of vowels (Howard, 1995). Changes observed in the EGG waveform during fricative production, thought to result from the rise in the supraglottal pressure due to a supraglottal constriction (Rothenberg & Mahshie, 1988), may be useful in a definition of weak voicing (Pinho, Jesus, & Barney, 2009). Some differences in the OQ values were also observed for different places of articulation: alveolar (/z/) fricatives showed OQ values slightly lower (59±9) than labio-dentals (/v/) and postalveolars (/Z/) (61-65±9). Further work is needed to relate these results to vocal fold mechanics.
In future work we plan to extract the OQ from the inverse-filtered glottal flow (a signal we simultaneously acquired during data collection) in order to extend our study of OQ to UVFP patients where EGG cannot be reliably collected.
Pinho, C.M.R.
e7d86d4b-4f5b-45dd-b3e0-7f9e8fe00394
Jesus, L.M.T.
1593173b-2495-47ba-b37d-f15bcc2d0e5a
Barney, A.
bc0ee7f7-517a-4154-ab7d-57270de3e815
Pinho, C.M.R.
e7d86d4b-4f5b-45dd-b3e0-7f9e8fe00394
Jesus, L.M.T.
1593173b-2495-47ba-b37d-f15bcc2d0e5a
Barney, A.
bc0ee7f7-517a-4154-ab7d-57270de3e815

Pinho, C.M.R., Jesus, L.M.T. and Barney, A. (2010) Analysis of open quotient in voiced fricative production using EGG. 9th International Conference on Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Voice and Speech Research, Erlangen, Germany. 10 - 11 Sep 2010.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Introduction
Electroglottography (EGG) is a common method for providing noninvasive measurements of glottal activity. The object of this study was to characterise EGG based parameters, specifically the open quotient (OQ), during fricative production, and during the phones preceding and following the fricative in a carrier phrase. With the OQ measures we aim to quantitatively establish if the relatively weak voicing during the fricative production may be differentiated from the stronger voicing of the contextual vowel. Our long term goal is to understand the mechanisms by which voicing is initiated and maintained as a guide to improving strategies for initiating and maintaining voicing in patients with laryngeal impairment such as unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) (Pinho, Jesus, & Barney, 2009).

Methods
Data were collected from two adult female (JG and HV) and two adult male (LJ and RS) speakers of EP. None had reported speech, language or hearing disorders, and all had normal vocal qualities. They were assessed by an experienced Speech and Language Therapist using a standardised evaluation protocol (Jesus, et al., 2009). Speakers were recorded producing 51 utterances, including 9 isolated words containing the EP voiced fricatives /v, z, Z/, in initial, medial and final word position, and the same 9 words embedded in 51 different carrier sentences, that presented a variety of consonantal (taps, laterals, stops and nasals) and vocalic (close, open front and back vowels) contexts in real EP sentences (only vowel-fricative-vowel sequences were analysed). To analyse the EGG signal we built Matlab scripts based on the open source software “MOQ interface” (Henrich, Alessandro, Doval, & Castellengo, 2004; Henrich, Gendrot, Michaud, & Tuan, 2005). We used the method “DEGG DECOM”, reported as the one that presented the best results compared to OQ measurements derived from the inverse-filtered glottal flow (Henrich, et al., 2004). These functions, developed for the singing voice (Henrich, et al., 2004), assume a quasi-periodic signal and were therefore considered to be more suitable for voiced
fricative analysis. To characterise the fricatives in terms of their production mechanisms, we analysed the OQ derived from the EGG signal during the steady state of the fricative and of the adjacent vowels. The strategy used to correlate and extract information from these different modes of speech production was based on average values calculated for the OQ within phone1 (vowel), phone2 (fricative) and phone3 (vowel).

Results
We calculated for each phone (1, 2 and 3) the average of the OQ values derived from EGGDEGG. In cases where the peaks do not stand out clearly and the OQ cannot be calculated reliably, it does not make sense to talk of an OQ at all (Henrich, et al., 2005). Therefore, zero and nonsense OQ values (e.g., fundamental frequency derived from EGG, with values equal or greater than 400Hz) were not included in subsequent analysis. For both female and male data, an increase in the OQ values during fricative production (phone2) was observed when compared to OQ values from the adjacent vowels (phone1 and phone3), as shown in Table 1.

Discussion
There was a small increase in the OQ values during the fricative, relative to that of the adjacent vowels. We can hypothesise that a more physically efficient voice is related with a decrease of the OQ value during the production of vowels (Howard, 1995). Changes observed in the EGG waveform during fricative production, thought to result from the rise in the supraglottal pressure due to a supraglottal constriction (Rothenberg & Mahshie, 1988), may be useful in a definition of weak voicing (Pinho, Jesus, & Barney, 2009). Some differences in the OQ values were also observed for different places of articulation: alveolar (/z/) fricatives showed OQ values slightly lower (59±9) than labio-dentals (/v/) and postalveolars (/Z/) (61-65±9). Further work is needed to relate these results to vocal fold mechanics.
In future work we plan to extract the OQ from the inverse-filtered glottal flow (a signal we simultaneously acquired during data collection) in order to extend our study of OQ to UVFP patients where EGG cannot be reliably collected.

Image
aql_cost_program_v4[1].bmp - Other
Download (543kB)

More information

Published date: September 2010
Venue - Dates: 9th International Conference on Advances in Quantitative Laryngology, Voice and Speech Research, Erlangen, Germany, 2010-09-10 - 2010-09-11
Related URLs:

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 164339
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/164339
PURE UUID: e8f93526-2a8e-4be4-9968-45ecabca0b0e
ORCID for A. Barney: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-1478

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Sep 2010 10:36
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: C.M.R. Pinho
Author: L.M.T. Jesus
Author: A. Barney ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×