The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas

The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas
The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas
The controversy about the use of data from human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides as part of regulatory risk assessment has been widely discussed, but the complex and interrelated scientific and ethical issues remain largely unresolved. This discussion paper, generated by authors who comprised a workgroup of the ICOH Scientific Committee on Rural Health, reviews the use of human experimental studies in regulatory risk assessment for pesticides with a view to advancing the debate as to when, if ever, such studies might be ethically justifiable. The discussion is based on three elements: (a) a review of discussion papers on the topic of human testing of pesticides and the positions adopted by regulatory agencies in developed countries; (b) an analysis of published and unpublished studies involving human testing with pesticides, both in the peer-reviewed literature and in the JMPR database; and (c) application of an ethical analysis to the problem. The paper identifies areas of agreement which include general principles that may provide a starting point on which to base criteria for judgements as to the ethical acceptability of such studies. However, the paper also highlights ongoing unresolved differences of opinion inherent in ethical analysis of contentious issues, which we propose should form a starting point for further debate and the development of guidelines to achieve better resolution of this matter.

1476-069X
50
London, Leslie
be1a535c-1158-47ed-a576-49206d16a3f7
Coggon, David
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Moretto, Angelo
e73e3a39-a56d-402b-b064-6b9a218261d7
Westerholm, Peter
1d06ea5c-1b8a-483a-bab1-e14992154935
Wilks, Martin
5623f947-15f0-4c03-8d86-2c7bbb1f5c0f
Colosio, Claudio
b70480ea-6dc7-47d7-ae39-b0c4b6840344
London, Leslie
be1a535c-1158-47ed-a576-49206d16a3f7
Coggon, David
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Moretto, Angelo
e73e3a39-a56d-402b-b064-6b9a218261d7
Westerholm, Peter
1d06ea5c-1b8a-483a-bab1-e14992154935
Wilks, Martin
5623f947-15f0-4c03-8d86-2c7bbb1f5c0f
Colosio, Claudio
b70480ea-6dc7-47d7-ae39-b0c4b6840344

London, Leslie, Coggon, David, Moretto, Angelo, Westerholm, Peter, Wilks, Martin and Colosio, Claudio (2010) The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas. Environmental Health, 9, 50. (doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-50). (PMID:20718963)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The controversy about the use of data from human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides as part of regulatory risk assessment has been widely discussed, but the complex and interrelated scientific and ethical issues remain largely unresolved. This discussion paper, generated by authors who comprised a workgroup of the ICOH Scientific Committee on Rural Health, reviews the use of human experimental studies in regulatory risk assessment for pesticides with a view to advancing the debate as to when, if ever, such studies might be ethically justifiable. The discussion is based on three elements: (a) a review of discussion papers on the topic of human testing of pesticides and the positions adopted by regulatory agencies in developed countries; (b) an analysis of published and unpublished studies involving human testing with pesticides, both in the peer-reviewed literature and in the JMPR database; and (c) application of an ethical analysis to the problem. The paper identifies areas of agreement which include general principles that may provide a starting point on which to base criteria for judgements as to the ethical acceptability of such studies. However, the paper also highlights ongoing unresolved differences of opinion inherent in ethical analysis of contentious issues, which we propose should form a starting point for further debate and the development of guidelines to achieve better resolution of this matter.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: August 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 164917
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/164917
ISSN: 1476-069X
PURE UUID: 96d11654-42d7-4891-9125-7b4d2d003261
ORCID for David Coggon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1930-3987

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2010 08:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Leslie London
Author: David Coggon ORCID iD
Author: Angelo Moretto
Author: Peter Westerholm
Author: Martin Wilks
Author: Claudio Colosio

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×