Does the merger paradox exist even without any regulations? Evidence from Germany in the pre-1914 period
Does the merger paradox exist even without any regulations? Evidence from Germany in the pre-1914 period
This paper measures the market response triggered by merger announcements in an environment without regulations and without a strong separation of ownership and control in Germany. Based on event study methods applied to daily data and regression analyses, I evaluate whether the merger paradox existed, and how firm size, the way of financing a merger, and industry factors influenced the success of acquirers. Hence, my study can shed some light on commonly believed explanations for the bad performance of mergers. The whole portfolio of acquirers exhibited positive cumulated abnormal returns, which indicates a rejection of the merger paradox—but market values of some companies declined. Particularly, acquiring banks lost shareholder value, although the majority of mergers occurred in the banking industry. Caused by the new exchange law, banks were in a merger wave. Therefore, alternative explanations like the minimax-regret principle might explain why banks merged in spite of lacking success
315-328
Kling, Gerhard
feea1f9e-c49a-4d9c-b688-ec839cef9624
December 2006
Kling, Gerhard
feea1f9e-c49a-4d9c-b688-ec839cef9624
Kling, Gerhard
(2006)
Does the merger paradox exist even without any regulations? Evidence from Germany in the pre-1914 period.
Empirica, 33 (5), .
(doi:10.1007/s10663-006-9019-7).
Abstract
This paper measures the market response triggered by merger announcements in an environment without regulations and without a strong separation of ownership and control in Germany. Based on event study methods applied to daily data and regression analyses, I evaluate whether the merger paradox existed, and how firm size, the way of financing a merger, and industry factors influenced the success of acquirers. Hence, my study can shed some light on commonly believed explanations for the bad performance of mergers. The whole portfolio of acquirers exhibited positive cumulated abnormal returns, which indicates a rejection of the merger paradox—but market values of some companies declined. Particularly, acquiring banks lost shareholder value, although the majority of mergers occurred in the banking industry. Caused by the new exchange law, banks were in a merger wave. Therefore, alternative explanations like the minimax-regret principle might explain why banks merged in spite of lacking success
Text
Merger_Announcements.doc
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: December 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 165725
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/165725
ISSN: 0340-8744
PURE UUID: 1b416fea-23f5-4f79-858b-91ef9be05e4d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Oct 2010 07:51
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gerhard Kling
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics