Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials
Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials
Objective To examine the impact of telephone follow-up interventions on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using The Cochrane Library, including the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINHAL, together with citation searching. The included studies were randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All the included trials were subject to critical appraisal. Data were extracted on study design, characteristics of patients, exact nature of the telephone intervention and details of comparison. Pooled standardized effects were calculated for the primary outcome. Glycaemic control was measured by HbA1c.
Results HbA1c levels reported in the reviewed studies were pooled using random effects models. The standardized effect of telephone follow-up was equivocal, with endpoint data showing weighted mean differences of –0.44 (95% CI –0.93 to 0.06) (Z = –1.72, P = 0.08) in favour of the telephone follow-up intervention. Subgroup analysis of more intensive interventions (interactive follow-up with health professional plus automated follow-up or non-interactive follow-up) showed (n = 1057) a significant benefit in favour of the treatment group, with a standardized mean difference of –0.84 (95% CI –1.67 to 0.0) (Z = 1.97, P = 0.05), indicating that more intensive (targeted) modes of follow-up may have better effects on glycaemic control.
Conclusions The analysis suggested that telephone follow-up interventions following a more intensive targeted approach could have a positive impact on glycaemic control for Type 2 diabetes.
diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, systematic review meta-analysis, telephone follow-up
1217-1225
Wu, L.
c985683b-b38a-4c64-aa41-820a1f233bcd
Forbes, A.
6b977d93-b977-4390-b37e-4d46e6e6edc0
While, A.
d8f58dcc-6e46-412b-9ea0-8c5379bd48bf
Griffiths, P.
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
November 2010
Wu, L.
c985683b-b38a-4c64-aa41-820a1f233bcd
Forbes, A.
6b977d93-b977-4390-b37e-4d46e6e6edc0
While, A.
d8f58dcc-6e46-412b-9ea0-8c5379bd48bf
Griffiths, P.
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Wu, L., Forbes, A., While, A. and Griffiths, P.
(2010)
Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials.
Diabetic Medicine, 27 (11), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03113.x).
(PMID:20950378)
Abstract
Objective To examine the impact of telephone follow-up interventions on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using The Cochrane Library, including the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINHAL, together with citation searching. The included studies were randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All the included trials were subject to critical appraisal. Data were extracted on study design, characteristics of patients, exact nature of the telephone intervention and details of comparison. Pooled standardized effects were calculated for the primary outcome. Glycaemic control was measured by HbA1c.
Results HbA1c levels reported in the reviewed studies were pooled using random effects models. The standardized effect of telephone follow-up was equivocal, with endpoint data showing weighted mean differences of –0.44 (95% CI –0.93 to 0.06) (Z = –1.72, P = 0.08) in favour of the telephone follow-up intervention. Subgroup analysis of more intensive interventions (interactive follow-up with health professional plus automated follow-up or non-interactive follow-up) showed (n = 1057) a significant benefit in favour of the treatment group, with a standardized mean difference of –0.84 (95% CI –1.67 to 0.0) (Z = 1.97, P = 0.05), indicating that more intensive (targeted) modes of follow-up may have better effects on glycaemic control.
Conclusions The analysis suggested that telephone follow-up interventions following a more intensive targeted approach could have a positive impact on glycaemic control for Type 2 diabetes.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: November 2010
Keywords:
diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, systematic review meta-analysis, telephone follow-up
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 167303
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/167303
ISSN: 0742-3071
PURE UUID: f9ad0c4e-94d1-47e8-bd1e-38e3019d5070
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Nov 2010 11:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
L. Wu
Author:
A. Forbes
Author:
A. While
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics