The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials

Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials
Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials
Objective To examine the impact of telephone follow-up interventions on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using The Cochrane Library, including the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINHAL, together with citation searching. The included studies were randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All the included trials were subject to critical appraisal. Data were extracted on study design, characteristics of patients, exact nature of the telephone intervention and details of comparison. Pooled standardized effects were calculated for the primary outcome. Glycaemic control was measured by HbA1c.

Results HbA1c levels reported in the reviewed studies were pooled using random effects models. The standardized effect of telephone follow-up was equivocal, with endpoint data showing weighted mean differences of –0.44 (95% CI –0.93 to 0.06) (Z = –1.72, P = 0.08) in favour of the telephone follow-up intervention. Subgroup analysis of more intensive interventions (interactive follow-up with health professional plus automated follow-up or non-interactive follow-up) showed (n = 1057) a significant benefit in favour of the treatment group, with a standardized mean difference of –0.84 (95% CI –1.67 to 0.0) (Z = 1.97, P = 0.05), indicating that more intensive (targeted) modes of follow-up may have better effects on glycaemic control.

Conclusions The analysis suggested that telephone follow-up interventions following a more intensive targeted approach could have a positive impact on glycaemic control for Type 2 diabetes.
diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, systematic review meta-analysis, telephone follow-up
0742-3071
1217-1225
Wu, L.
c985683b-b38a-4c64-aa41-820a1f233bcd
Forbes, A.
6b977d93-b977-4390-b37e-4d46e6e6edc0
While, A.
d8f58dcc-6e46-412b-9ea0-8c5379bd48bf
Griffiths, P.
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Wu, L.
c985683b-b38a-4c64-aa41-820a1f233bcd
Forbes, A.
6b977d93-b977-4390-b37e-4d46e6e6edc0
While, A.
d8f58dcc-6e46-412b-9ea0-8c5379bd48bf
Griffiths, P.
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b

Wu, L., Forbes, A., While, A. and Griffiths, P. (2010) Telephone follow-up to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis of controlled trials. Diabetic Medicine, 27 (11), 1217-1225. (doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03113.x). (PMID:20950378)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective To examine the impact of telephone follow-up interventions on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using The Cochrane Library, including the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINHAL, together with citation searching. The included studies were randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a telephone follow-up intervention on glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. All the included trials were subject to critical appraisal. Data were extracted on study design, characteristics of patients, exact nature of the telephone intervention and details of comparison. Pooled standardized effects were calculated for the primary outcome. Glycaemic control was measured by HbA1c.

Results HbA1c levels reported in the reviewed studies were pooled using random effects models. The standardized effect of telephone follow-up was equivocal, with endpoint data showing weighted mean differences of –0.44 (95% CI –0.93 to 0.06) (Z = –1.72, P = 0.08) in favour of the telephone follow-up intervention. Subgroup analysis of more intensive interventions (interactive follow-up with health professional plus automated follow-up or non-interactive follow-up) showed (n = 1057) a significant benefit in favour of the treatment group, with a standardized mean difference of –0.84 (95% CI –1.67 to 0.0) (Z = 1.97, P = 0.05), indicating that more intensive (targeted) modes of follow-up may have better effects on glycaemic control.

Conclusions The analysis suggested that telephone follow-up interventions following a more intensive targeted approach could have a positive impact on glycaemic control for Type 2 diabetes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2010
Keywords: diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, systematic review meta-analysis, telephone follow-up

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 167303
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/167303
ISSN: 0742-3071
PURE UUID: f9ad0c4e-94d1-47e8-bd1e-38e3019d5070
ORCID for P. Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2857

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Nov 2010 11:54
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Wu
Author: A. Forbes
Author: A. While
Author: P. Griffiths ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×