The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The development and validation of an outcome measure for spiritual healing: A mixed methods study

The development and validation of an outcome measure for spiritual healing: A mixed methods study
The development and validation of an outcome measure for spiritual healing: A mixed methods study
Background: Spiritual healing, probably the oldest documented paramedical intervention, is a neglected area of research. In order to conduct further research into the effects of healing, a valid and reliable outcome measure is needed that captures the experience of individuals receiving healing (healees) and is not burdensome to complete. We aimed to develop such a measure. Methods: A mixed methods design was used. Focus groups and cognitive interviews were used to generate and refine questionnaire items grounded in the experiences and language of healees (Study 1). The resulting questionnaire was tested and its formal psychometric properties were evaluated (Study 2). Participants were recruited from a spiritual healing sanctuary and via individual healers (including registered spiritual healers, Reiki practitioners, healers affiliated with churches). Results: In Study 1, 24 participants took part in 7 focus groups and 6 cognitive interviews. 29 common effects were identified and grouped into 7 discrete dimensions that appeared to characterize potentially sustainable effects reported by participants following their experiences of spiritual healing. In Study 2, 393 participants returned completed baseline questionnaires, 243 of whom completed the questionnaire again 1–6 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis generated 5 subscales, based on 20 of the items: outlook, energy, health, relationships and emotional balance. These subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Three of the subscales and the whole questionnaire demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Conclusions: We have produced a psychometrically sound healing impact questionnaire that is acceptable to healees, healers and researchers for use in future evaluations of spiritual healing.
outcome assessment, quality of life, spiritual therapies, qualitative research
0033-3190
350-362
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Barlow, Fiona
4acd979b-0420-4003-9422-e2f87f3ec5d4
Walker, Jan
592c6998-aa44-4ef2-a225-bdff4cb0ee61
McDermott, Clare
731edcc4-daf0-432d-98aa-45052beae320
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Barlow, Fiona
4acd979b-0420-4003-9422-e2f87f3ec5d4
Walker, Jan
592c6998-aa44-4ef2-a225-bdff4cb0ee61
McDermott, Clare
731edcc4-daf0-432d-98aa-45052beae320
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Bishop, Felicity L., Barlow, Fiona, Walker, Jan, McDermott, Clare and Lewith, George T. (2010) The development and validation of an outcome measure for spiritual healing: A mixed methods study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79 (6), 350-362. (doi:10.1159/000320120).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Spiritual healing, probably the oldest documented paramedical intervention, is a neglected area of research. In order to conduct further research into the effects of healing, a valid and reliable outcome measure is needed that captures the experience of individuals receiving healing (healees) and is not burdensome to complete. We aimed to develop such a measure. Methods: A mixed methods design was used. Focus groups and cognitive interviews were used to generate and refine questionnaire items grounded in the experiences and language of healees (Study 1). The resulting questionnaire was tested and its formal psychometric properties were evaluated (Study 2). Participants were recruited from a spiritual healing sanctuary and via individual healers (including registered spiritual healers, Reiki practitioners, healers affiliated with churches). Results: In Study 1, 24 participants took part in 7 focus groups and 6 cognitive interviews. 29 common effects were identified and grouped into 7 discrete dimensions that appeared to characterize potentially sustainable effects reported by participants following their experiences of spiritual healing. In Study 2, 393 participants returned completed baseline questionnaires, 243 of whom completed the questionnaire again 1–6 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis generated 5 subscales, based on 20 of the items: outlook, energy, health, relationships and emotional balance. These subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Three of the subscales and the whole questionnaire demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Conclusions: We have produced a psychometrically sound healing impact questionnaire that is acceptable to healees, healers and researchers for use in future evaluations of spiritual healing.

Text
POSTPRINT HEHIQ development.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (158kB)

More information

Published date: October 2010
Keywords: outcome assessment, quality of life, spiritual therapies, qualitative research

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 167889
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/167889
ISSN: 0033-3190
PURE UUID: 2542c943-678c-458d-819b-9323865fb8de
ORCID for Felicity L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662
ORCID for Clare McDermott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-2116

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Nov 2010 09:38
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fiona Barlow
Author: Jan Walker
Author: Clare McDermott ORCID iD
Author: George T. Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×