Participating in and delivering the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage)interventions for chronic back pain: a qualitative study of professional perspectives
Participating in and delivering the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage)interventions for chronic back pain: a qualitative study of professional perspectives
Objectives: To outline professionals’ experiences of participation, perceived benefits and acceptability of the interventions delivered in the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage), for patients with chronic or recurrent back pain.
Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with a purposeful sample of twenty professionals (general practitioners(GPs), nurses, Alexander technique teachers, and massage therapists).Data were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the constant comparison method.
Results: Evidence of effectiveness GPs wanted an evidence base for the interventions, whilst nurses, Alexander technique teachers and massage therapists perceived patient reports of benefit as evidence. Professionals’ perception of the acceptability of the intervention:
professional perspectives differed, with GPs and nurses viewing the structured nature of exercise prescription and Alexander technique lessons as more beneficial and acceptable than massage in alleviating patients’ backpain. Economic cost: the cost to patients pursuing Alexander technique lessons and massage was perceived to be a barrier outside the trial. Inter-professional communication: there was little communication between the professionals groups within the trial.
Conclusions: Valuable insights have been gained in to the perceived benefits and acceptability of exercise, Alexander technique lessons and massage as interventions for chronic back pain. Lessons in the Alexander technique with or without exercise, was perceived as more beneficial and acceptable than massage by professionals who participated and delivered the ATEAM trial
interventions.
119 -127
Beattie, Angela
a681b4cd-1480-4b97-85d6-b003978c872d
Shaw, Alison
07447f29-cb39-432c-b639-38bccb74c55d
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Sharp, Debbie
d9bbb95c-bc44-4be2-9de8-f08cdc8ae7b7
June 2010
Beattie, Angela
a681b4cd-1480-4b97-85d6-b003978c872d
Shaw, Alison
07447f29-cb39-432c-b639-38bccb74c55d
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Sharp, Debbie
d9bbb95c-bc44-4be2-9de8-f08cdc8ae7b7
Beattie, Angela, Shaw, Alison, Yardley, Lucy, Little, Paul and Sharp, Debbie
(2010)
Participating in and delivering the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage)interventions for chronic back pain: a qualitative study of professional perspectives.
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 18 (3-4), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2010.05.037).
Abstract
Objectives: To outline professionals’ experiences of participation, perceived benefits and acceptability of the interventions delivered in the ATEAM trial (Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage), for patients with chronic or recurrent back pain.
Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with a purposeful sample of twenty professionals (general practitioners(GPs), nurses, Alexander technique teachers, and massage therapists).Data were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the constant comparison method.
Results: Evidence of effectiveness GPs wanted an evidence base for the interventions, whilst nurses, Alexander technique teachers and massage therapists perceived patient reports of benefit as evidence. Professionals’ perception of the acceptability of the intervention:
professional perspectives differed, with GPs and nurses viewing the structured nature of exercise prescription and Alexander technique lessons as more beneficial and acceptable than massage in alleviating patients’ backpain. Economic cost: the cost to patients pursuing Alexander technique lessons and massage was perceived to be a barrier outside the trial. Inter-professional communication: there was little communication between the professionals groups within the trial.
Conclusions: Valuable insights have been gained in to the perceived benefits and acceptability of exercise, Alexander technique lessons and massage as interventions for chronic back pain. Lessons in the Alexander technique with or without exercise, was perceived as more beneficial and acceptable than massage by professionals who participated and delivered the ATEAM trial
interventions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 168103
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/168103
ISSN: 0965-2299
PURE UUID: 392462dc-313f-44bf-a232-dbdc72977013
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Nov 2010 14:22
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 02:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Angela Beattie
Author:
Alison Shaw
Author:
Debbie Sharp
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics