The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is popular for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) although there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of current clinical evidence for TCM's therapeutic effect and safety.

Objective: To review systematically the beneficial and harmful effects of TCM therapies for FM.

Methods: We searched six English and Chinese electronic databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TCM for treatment of FM. Two authors extracted data and assessed the trial quality independently. RevMan 5 software was used for data analyses with an effect estimate presented as mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Twenty-five RCTs were identified with 1516 participants for this review. Seven trials (28%) were evaluated as having a low risk of bias and the remaining trials were identified as being as unclear or having a high risk of bias. Overall, ten trials were eligible for the meta-analysis, and data from remaining 15 trials were synthesized qualitatively. Acupuncture reduced the number of tender points (MD, –3.21; 95% CI –4.23 to –2.11; p<0.00001, I2=0%), and pain scores compared with conventional medications (MD, –1.78; 95% CI, –2.24 to –1.32; p<0.00001; I2=0%). Acupuncture showed no significant effect, with a random-effect model, compared with sham acupuncture (MD, –0.55; 95% CI, –1.35–0.24; p=0.17; I2=69%), on pain reduction. A combination of acupuncture and cupping therapy was better than conventional medications for reducing pain (MD, –1.66; 95% CI, –2.14 to –1.19; p<0.00001; I2=0%), and for improving depression scores with related to FM (MD, –4.92; 95% CI, –6.49 to –3.34; p<0.00001; I2=32%). Other individual trials demonstrated positive effects of Chinese herbal medicine on pain reduction compared with conventional medications. There were no serious adverse effects reported that were related to TCM therapies in these trials.

Conclusions: TCM therapies appear to be effective for treating FM. However, further large, rigorously designed trials are warranted because of insufficient methodological rigor in the included trials.

1075-5535
397-409
Cao, Huijuan
36834085-4d53-4cae-9f71-cd8c11dc9f21
Liu, JianPing
4699004b-2872-49f2-b2f9-f90a061a29db
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Cao, Huijuan
36834085-4d53-4cae-9f71-cd8c11dc9f21
Liu, JianPing
4699004b-2872-49f2-b2f9-f90a061a29db
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Cao, Huijuan, Liu, JianPing and Lewith, George T. (2010) Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16 (4), 397-409. (doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0599). (PMID:20423209)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is popular for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) although there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of current clinical evidence for TCM's therapeutic effect and safety.

Objective: To review systematically the beneficial and harmful effects of TCM therapies for FM.

Methods: We searched six English and Chinese electronic databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TCM for treatment of FM. Two authors extracted data and assessed the trial quality independently. RevMan 5 software was used for data analyses with an effect estimate presented as mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Twenty-five RCTs were identified with 1516 participants for this review. Seven trials (28%) were evaluated as having a low risk of bias and the remaining trials were identified as being as unclear or having a high risk of bias. Overall, ten trials were eligible for the meta-analysis, and data from remaining 15 trials were synthesized qualitatively. Acupuncture reduced the number of tender points (MD, –3.21; 95% CI –4.23 to –2.11; p<0.00001, I2=0%), and pain scores compared with conventional medications (MD, –1.78; 95% CI, –2.24 to –1.32; p<0.00001; I2=0%). Acupuncture showed no significant effect, with a random-effect model, compared with sham acupuncture (MD, –0.55; 95% CI, –1.35–0.24; p=0.17; I2=69%), on pain reduction. A combination of acupuncture and cupping therapy was better than conventional medications for reducing pain (MD, –1.66; 95% CI, –2.14 to –1.19; p<0.00001; I2=0%), and for improving depression scores with related to FM (MD, –4.92; 95% CI, –6.49 to –3.34; p<0.00001; I2=32%). Other individual trials demonstrated positive effects of Chinese herbal medicine on pain reduction compared with conventional medications. There were no serious adverse effects reported that were related to TCM therapies in these trials.

Conclusions: TCM therapies appear to be effective for treating FM. However, further large, rigorously designed trials are warranted because of insufficient methodological rigor in the included trials.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 April 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 168309
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/168309
ISSN: 1075-5535
PURE UUID: 019b5496-5c8a-4f93-921d-7222b03bdb32

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Nov 2010 14:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Huijuan Cao
Author: JianPing Liu
Author: George T. Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×