Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is popular for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) although there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of current clinical evidence for TCM's therapeutic effect and safety.
Objective: To review systematically the beneficial and harmful effects of TCM therapies for FM.
Methods: We searched six English and Chinese electronic databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TCM for treatment of FM. Two authors extracted data and assessed the trial quality independently. RevMan 5 software was used for data analyses with an effect estimate presented as mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: Twenty-five RCTs were identified with 1516 participants for this review. Seven trials (28%) were evaluated as having a low risk of bias and the remaining trials were identified as being as unclear or having a high risk of bias. Overall, ten trials were eligible for the meta-analysis, and data from remaining 15 trials were synthesized qualitatively. Acupuncture reduced the number of tender points (MD, –3.21; 95% CI –4.23 to –2.11; p<0.00001, I2=0%), and pain scores compared with conventional medications (MD, –1.78; 95% CI, –2.24 to –1.32; p<0.00001; I2=0%). Acupuncture showed no significant effect, with a random-effect model, compared with sham acupuncture (MD, –0.55; 95% CI, –1.35–0.24; p=0.17; I2=69%), on pain reduction. A combination of acupuncture and cupping therapy was better than conventional medications for reducing pain (MD, –1.66; 95% CI, –2.14 to –1.19; p<0.00001; I2=0%), and for improving depression scores with related to FM (MD, –4.92; 95% CI, –6.49 to –3.34; p<0.00001; I2=32%). Other individual trials demonstrated positive effects of Chinese herbal medicine on pain reduction compared with conventional medications. There were no serious adverse effects reported that were related to TCM therapies in these trials.
Conclusions: TCM therapies appear to be effective for treating FM. However, further large, rigorously designed trials are warranted because of insufficient methodological rigor in the included trials.
397-409
Cao, Huijuan
36834085-4d53-4cae-9f71-cd8c11dc9f21
Liu, JianPing
4699004b-2872-49f2-b2f9-f90a061a29db
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
27 April 2010
Cao, Huijuan
36834085-4d53-4cae-9f71-cd8c11dc9f21
Liu, JianPing
4699004b-2872-49f2-b2f9-f90a061a29db
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Cao, Huijuan, Liu, JianPing and Lewith, George T.
(2010)
Traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 16 (4), .
(doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0599).
(PMID:20423209)
Abstract
Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is popular for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) although there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of current clinical evidence for TCM's therapeutic effect and safety.
Objective: To review systematically the beneficial and harmful effects of TCM therapies for FM.
Methods: We searched six English and Chinese electronic databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TCM for treatment of FM. Two authors extracted data and assessed the trial quality independently. RevMan 5 software was used for data analyses with an effect estimate presented as mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: Twenty-five RCTs were identified with 1516 participants for this review. Seven trials (28%) were evaluated as having a low risk of bias and the remaining trials were identified as being as unclear or having a high risk of bias. Overall, ten trials were eligible for the meta-analysis, and data from remaining 15 trials were synthesized qualitatively. Acupuncture reduced the number of tender points (MD, –3.21; 95% CI –4.23 to –2.11; p<0.00001, I2=0%), and pain scores compared with conventional medications (MD, –1.78; 95% CI, –2.24 to –1.32; p<0.00001; I2=0%). Acupuncture showed no significant effect, with a random-effect model, compared with sham acupuncture (MD, –0.55; 95% CI, –1.35–0.24; p=0.17; I2=69%), on pain reduction. A combination of acupuncture and cupping therapy was better than conventional medications for reducing pain (MD, –1.66; 95% CI, –2.14 to –1.19; p<0.00001; I2=0%), and for improving depression scores with related to FM (MD, –4.92; 95% CI, –6.49 to –3.34; p<0.00001; I2=32%). Other individual trials demonstrated positive effects of Chinese herbal medicine on pain reduction compared with conventional medications. There were no serious adverse effects reported that were related to TCM therapies in these trials.
Conclusions: TCM therapies appear to be effective for treating FM. However, further large, rigorously designed trials are warranted because of insufficient methodological rigor in the included trials.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 27 April 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 168309
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/168309
ISSN: 1075-5535
PURE UUID: 019b5496-5c8a-4f93-921d-7222b03bdb32
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Nov 2010 14:14
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Huijuan Cao
Author:
JianPing Liu
Author:
George T. Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics