Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated):
A systematic review of the complexities of projects
Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated):
A systematic review of the complexities of projects
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to OM Practice Contingency Research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects.
Methodology: This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects.
Findings: This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies.
Originality and contributions: The contribution of this work is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.
Geraldi, Joana G
de8f3a36-a6c2-4184-9811-6f7c77e642e9
Maylor, Harvey
65e65c91-086e-4d0c-9407-f2cbb21d135b
Williams, Terry
085e6e3e-f94e-435c-936e-82fb0c5c4ae8
Geraldi, Joana G
de8f3a36-a6c2-4184-9811-6f7c77e642e9
Maylor, Harvey
65e65c91-086e-4d0c-9407-f2cbb21d135b
Williams, Terry
085e6e3e-f94e-435c-936e-82fb0c5c4ae8
Geraldi, Joana G, Maylor, Harvey and Williams, Terry
(2010)
Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated):
A systematic review of the complexities of projects.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
(In Press)
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to OM Practice Contingency Research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects.
Methodology: This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects.
Findings: This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies.
Originality and contributions: The contribution of this work is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 169095
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/169095
ISSN: 0144-3577
PURE UUID: f06fcee7-60f2-4509-bb90-d8d077469e34
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Dec 2010 14:44
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 18:40
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Joana G Geraldi
Author:
Harvey Maylor
Author:
Terry Williams
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics