From the myth of Prometheus to strategic resilience: two cognitive paradigms linking risk and innovation
From the myth of Prometheus to strategic resilience: two cognitive paradigms linking risk and innovation
We argue that cognition linking risk to innovation is influenced by two distinct cognitive paradigms which have deep roots in personality and culture and are closely bound up with political identity. We differentiate between a paradigm of Promethean conservatism where innovation is perceived as threatening, and a paradigm of ‘Strategic Resilience’, where the status quo is perceived as
threatening and innovation is perceived to reduce this threat. We find an evidence base for these paradigms in the personality psychology literature, which shows a
strong tendency for psychometric measures of risk and innovation to correlate positively with each other and negatively with measures of conservatism and authoritarianism. We develop four theoretical elaborations from this greatly underutilised evidence base: (1) we seem to possess powerful ‘implicit personality theories’ (IPTs) which conflate the risk taker with the innovator; (2) these IPTs lead us to evaluate risk-taking innovation either positively or negatively; (3) these evaluations also manifest the positions we adopt, as we undertake identity work, along the rich and complex personological and cultural continuum that contrasts risk-averse conservatism with liberal radicalism; and (4) this highly political self-positioning carries multiple implications for how we identify and evaluate risk within the context of organisational innovation
Marshall, Alasdair
93aa95a2-c707-4807-8eaa-1de3b994b616
Ojiako, Udechukwu
ba4aa342-5408-48d7-b71d-8197388bbb80
December 2010
Marshall, Alasdair
93aa95a2-c707-4807-8eaa-1de3b994b616
Ojiako, Udechukwu
ba4aa342-5408-48d7-b71d-8197388bbb80
Marshall, Alasdair and Ojiako, Udechukwu
(2010)
From the myth of Prometheus to strategic resilience: two cognitive paradigms linking risk and innovation.
Prometheus, 28 (4).
Abstract
We argue that cognition linking risk to innovation is influenced by two distinct cognitive paradigms which have deep roots in personality and culture and are closely bound up with political identity. We differentiate between a paradigm of Promethean conservatism where innovation is perceived as threatening, and a paradigm of ‘Strategic Resilience’, where the status quo is perceived as
threatening and innovation is perceived to reduce this threat. We find an evidence base for these paradigms in the personality psychology literature, which shows a
strong tendency for psychometric measures of risk and innovation to correlate positively with each other and negatively with measures of conservatism and authoritarianism. We develop four theoretical elaborations from this greatly underutilised evidence base: (1) we seem to possess powerful ‘implicit personality theories’ (IPTs) which conflate the risk taker with the innovator; (2) these IPTs lead us to evaluate risk-taking innovation either positively or negatively; (3) these evaluations also manifest the positions we adopt, as we undertake identity work, along the rich and complex personological and cultural continuum that contrasts risk-averse conservatism with liberal radicalism; and (4) this highly political self-positioning carries multiple implications for how we identify and evaluate risk within the context of organisational innovation
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 169437
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/169437
ISSN: 0810-9028
PURE UUID: a3385e4c-f86b-48b5-8313-500f5d9a3ad1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Dec 2010 09:55
Last modified: 28 Apr 2022 02:01
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Udechukwu Ojiako
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics