Public engagement to build trust: false hopes?
Public engagement to build trust: false hopes?
Public engagement through deliberative processes is promoted in both academic and policy circles as a potential means to build public trust in risk decisions and decision-makers. Governments in particular seem to optimistically take a positive relationship between public engagement and trust almost for granted. This paper provides a new and critical analysis of this hoped-for relationship, questioning whether such a direct and positive link between engagement and trust is a false hope. The paper draws upon personal experience of deliberative processes to discuss key components of an engagement process that have the potential to impact positively on trust. Specifically, who is engaged and which interests are represented; an open and collaborative framing of the discussion, and a direct and clear relationship between engagement and the risk decision. But the paper argues that given the complexities of optimising these process elements and in the light of the known underlying dimensions of trust, expectations are misplaced and that enduring trust is unlikely to spring from engagement itself. This is not to negate the other benefits of engagement, rather it is to focus on those key elements that will need to be in place, both process and beyond, if trust is to be enhanced.
trust, public engagement, deliberative processes, representation, decision-making
821-835
Petts, Judith
c2b0c58d-c78d-4f2e-9bec-fa4e23d72ef6
2008
Petts, Judith
c2b0c58d-c78d-4f2e-9bec-fa4e23d72ef6
Abstract
Public engagement through deliberative processes is promoted in both academic and policy circles as a potential means to build public trust in risk decisions and decision-makers. Governments in particular seem to optimistically take a positive relationship between public engagement and trust almost for granted. This paper provides a new and critical analysis of this hoped-for relationship, questioning whether such a direct and positive link between engagement and trust is a false hope. The paper draws upon personal experience of deliberative processes to discuss key components of an engagement process that have the potential to impact positively on trust. Specifically, who is engaged and which interests are represented; an open and collaborative framing of the discussion, and a direct and clear relationship between engagement and the risk decision. But the paper argues that given the complexities of optimising these process elements and in the light of the known underlying dimensions of trust, expectations are misplaced and that enduring trust is unlikely to spring from engagement itself. This is not to negate the other benefits of engagement, rather it is to focus on those key elements that will need to be in place, both process and beyond, if trust is to be enhanced.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 August 2008
Published date: 2008
Keywords:
trust, public engagement, deliberative processes, representation, decision-making
Organisations:
Social Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 170443
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/170443
ISSN: 1366-9877
PURE UUID: 3d9da604-4ac3-4d6e-b0a6-6777bfbe6dbf
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2011 09:37
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Judith Petts
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics