Time to listen
Time to listen
Gaining authentic voices in the production of research includes reflection on the process of research itself. The following paper reports on the work of an advisory group and raises issues about the extent to which it should be anticipated that such groups represent the feelings and interests of the wider community without the infrastructure and support to enable them to access these. Should we therefore conclude that advisory group members only speak for themselves? The process of developing the article also surfaced the emotional impact of recognizing that,whilst people may not share the same opinion or view, all views are valid. The paper provides important insights on the experience of contributing to the work of the group and the practices that support this. It was co-written using transcripts of discussion together with debate on symbol selection, to select key meanings to share with a wider audience. The paper is submitted here in both forms, without commentary or distancing academic argument, in recognition of the true value of such partnerships.
575-585
Porter, Jill
1d359640-b5ca-4d64-8979-68efb4bc093b
Aspinall, Ann
61374721-6371-4fb7-9ce7-9b6847f1db6d
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Simmonds, Lisa
05ba47cf-d7f1-4747-a786-1a94140da04b
Wood, Michelle
92125f71-5c58-4ee7-8263-d1078b63e3ab
Culley, Gordon
23b35d58-babd-4658-8cb8-f7e79f5576c7
Holroyd, Andrew
6a0addcc-6e5b-4f1f-aa3e-517dfe3cf393
August 2005
Porter, Jill
1d359640-b5ca-4d64-8979-68efb4bc093b
Aspinall, Ann
61374721-6371-4fb7-9ce7-9b6847f1db6d
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Simmonds, Lisa
05ba47cf-d7f1-4747-a786-1a94140da04b
Wood, Michelle
92125f71-5c58-4ee7-8263-d1078b63e3ab
Culley, Gordon
23b35d58-babd-4658-8cb8-f7e79f5576c7
Holroyd, Andrew
6a0addcc-6e5b-4f1f-aa3e-517dfe3cf393
Porter, Jill, Aspinall, Ann, Parsons, Sarah, Simmonds, Lisa, Wood, Michelle, Culley, Gordon and Holroyd, Andrew
(2005)
Time to listen.
Disability & Society, 20 (5), .
(doi:10.1080/09687590500156386).
Abstract
Gaining authentic voices in the production of research includes reflection on the process of research itself. The following paper reports on the work of an advisory group and raises issues about the extent to which it should be anticipated that such groups represent the feelings and interests of the wider community without the infrastructure and support to enable them to access these. Should we therefore conclude that advisory group members only speak for themselves? The process of developing the article also surfaced the emotional impact of recognizing that,whilst people may not share the same opinion or view, all views are valid. The paper provides important insights on the experience of contributing to the work of the group and the practices that support this. It was co-written using transcripts of discussion together with debate on symbol selection, to select key meanings to share with a wider audience. The paper is submitted here in both forms, without commentary or distancing academic argument, in recognition of the true value of such partnerships.
Text
Porter_et_al_2005_Disab_&_Soc.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: August 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 171379
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/171379
ISSN: 0968-7599
PURE UUID: 08829d37-5623-4ab0-bc1c-d0c6d1f9b20d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Jan 2011 09:47
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jill Porter
Author:
Ann Aspinall
Author:
Lisa Simmonds
Author:
Michelle Wood
Author:
Gordon Culley
Author:
Andrew Holroyd
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics