The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis

Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis
Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis
Background: The role of new T-cell–based blood tests for tuberculosis in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear.

Objective: To compare the performance of 2 interferon-? assays and tuberculin skin testing in adults with suspected tuberculosis.

Design: Prospective study conducted in routine practice.

Setting: 2 urban hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Patients: 389 adults, predominantly of South Asian and black ethnicity, with moderate to high clinical suspicion of active tuberculosis.

Intervention: Tuberculin skin testing, the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) incorporating early secretory antigenic target-6 and culture filtrate protein-10 (standard ELISpot), and ELISpot incorporating a novel antigen, Rv3879c (ELISpotPLUS) were performed during diagnostic assessment by independent persons who were blinded to results of the other test.

Measurements: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.

Results: 194 patients had a final diagnosis of active tuberculosis, of which 79% were culture-confirmed. Sensitivity for culture confirmed and highly probable tuberculosis was 89% (95% CI, 84% to 93%) with ELISpotPLUS, 85% (CI, 79% to 90%) with standard ELISpot, 79% (CI, 72% to 85%) with 15-mm threshold tuberculin skin testing, and 83% (CI, 77% to 89%) with stratified thresholds of 15 and 10 mm in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, respectively. The ELISpotPLUS assay was more sensitive than tuberculin skin testing with 15-mm cutoff points (P = 0.01) but not with stratified cutoff points (P = 0.10). The ELISpotPLUS assay had 4% higher diagnostic sensitivity than standard ELISpot (P = 0.02). Combined sensitivity of ELISpotPLUS and tuberculin skin testing was 99% (CI, 95% to 100%), conferring a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (CI, 0 to 0.06) when both test results were negative.

Limitations: Local standards for tuberculin skin testing differed from others used internationally. The study sample included few immunosuppressed patients.

Conclusion: The ELISpotPLUS assay is more sensitive than standard ELISpot and, when used in combination with tuberculin skin testing, enables rapid exclusion of active infection in patients with moderate to high pretest probability of tuberculosis.
0003-4819
325-336
Dosanjh, Davinder P.S.
41a07f95-7258-4084-8a30-37fcdc1073f5
Hinks, Timothy S.C.
14664ded-022f-47af-9d65-f49724a36e2f
Innes, John A.
1ec06c23-0edc-4c17-bd6a-2a2e88132c4c
Deeks, Jonathan J.
5770c02a-1faf-4df6-b6ad-f0e8ef4c0c2a
Pasvol, Geoffrey
5561ed07-fe85-42f1-b618-1269e4611d97
Hackforth, Sarah
8c13ee82-2042-400f-8e70-38f609cf0831
Varia, Hansa
cbd53635-599b-4f68-bb6a-ed7f1683c535
Millington, Kerry A
7231684e-0a43-4ac1-adb8-b9c27fe05b31
Gunatheesan, Rubamalar
6f727c8e-be9a-41d3-8c1c-c54f1d955283
Guyot-Revol, Valerie
41945b51-2e48-4ac4-9529-fb389daa2b8c
Lalvani, Ajit
ac754f14-ec6b-4a5b-8a72-6bb1e114b626
Dosanjh, Davinder P.S.
41a07f95-7258-4084-8a30-37fcdc1073f5
Hinks, Timothy S.C.
14664ded-022f-47af-9d65-f49724a36e2f
Innes, John A.
1ec06c23-0edc-4c17-bd6a-2a2e88132c4c
Deeks, Jonathan J.
5770c02a-1faf-4df6-b6ad-f0e8ef4c0c2a
Pasvol, Geoffrey
5561ed07-fe85-42f1-b618-1269e4611d97
Hackforth, Sarah
8c13ee82-2042-400f-8e70-38f609cf0831
Varia, Hansa
cbd53635-599b-4f68-bb6a-ed7f1683c535
Millington, Kerry A
7231684e-0a43-4ac1-adb8-b9c27fe05b31
Gunatheesan, Rubamalar
6f727c8e-be9a-41d3-8c1c-c54f1d955283
Guyot-Revol, Valerie
41945b51-2e48-4ac4-9529-fb389daa2b8c
Lalvani, Ajit
ac754f14-ec6b-4a5b-8a72-6bb1e114b626

Dosanjh, Davinder P.S., Hinks, Timothy S.C., Innes, John A., Deeks, Jonathan J., Pasvol, Geoffrey, Hackforth, Sarah, Varia, Hansa, Millington, Kerry A, Gunatheesan, Rubamalar, Guyot-Revol, Valerie and Lalvani, Ajit (2008) Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148 (5), 325-336. (PMID:1831675)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The role of new T-cell–based blood tests for tuberculosis in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear.

Objective: To compare the performance of 2 interferon-? assays and tuberculin skin testing in adults with suspected tuberculosis.

Design: Prospective study conducted in routine practice.

Setting: 2 urban hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Patients: 389 adults, predominantly of South Asian and black ethnicity, with moderate to high clinical suspicion of active tuberculosis.

Intervention: Tuberculin skin testing, the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) incorporating early secretory antigenic target-6 and culture filtrate protein-10 (standard ELISpot), and ELISpot incorporating a novel antigen, Rv3879c (ELISpotPLUS) were performed during diagnostic assessment by independent persons who were blinded to results of the other test.

Measurements: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.

Results: 194 patients had a final diagnosis of active tuberculosis, of which 79% were culture-confirmed. Sensitivity for culture confirmed and highly probable tuberculosis was 89% (95% CI, 84% to 93%) with ELISpotPLUS, 85% (CI, 79% to 90%) with standard ELISpot, 79% (CI, 72% to 85%) with 15-mm threshold tuberculin skin testing, and 83% (CI, 77% to 89%) with stratified thresholds of 15 and 10 mm in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, respectively. The ELISpotPLUS assay was more sensitive than tuberculin skin testing with 15-mm cutoff points (P = 0.01) but not with stratified cutoff points (P = 0.10). The ELISpotPLUS assay had 4% higher diagnostic sensitivity than standard ELISpot (P = 0.02). Combined sensitivity of ELISpotPLUS and tuberculin skin testing was 99% (CI, 95% to 100%), conferring a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (CI, 0 to 0.06) when both test results were negative.

Limitations: Local standards for tuberculin skin testing differed from others used internationally. The study sample included few immunosuppressed patients.

Conclusion: The ELISpotPLUS assay is more sensitive than standard ELISpot and, when used in combination with tuberculin skin testing, enables rapid exclusion of active infection in patients with moderate to high pretest probability of tuberculosis.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 4 March 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 171987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/171987
ISSN: 0003-4819
PURE UUID: 83cf5454-dcb5-4ba9-8737-19fbfcb6a477

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jan 2011 12:29
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 17:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: Davinder P.S. Dosanjh
Author: Timothy S.C. Hinks
Author: John A. Innes
Author: Jonathan J. Deeks
Author: Geoffrey Pasvol
Author: Sarah Hackforth
Author: Hansa Varia
Author: Kerry A Millington
Author: Rubamalar Gunatheesan
Author: Valerie Guyot-Revol
Author: Ajit Lalvani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×