Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
In this chapter we revisit the relationship between income and fertility. There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times. Several theories have been proposed in the literature to explain this somewhat puzzling fact. The most common one is based on the opportunity cost of time being higher for individuals with higher earnings. Alternatively, people might differ in their desire to procreate and accordingly some people invest more in children and less in market-specific human capital and thus have lower earnings. We revisit these and other possible explanations. We find that these theories are not as robust as is commonly believed. That is, several special assumptions are needed to generate the negative relationship. Not all assumptions are equally plausible. Such findings will be useful to distinguish alternative theories. We conclude that further research along these lines is needed.
9780226754727
43-100
University of Chicago Press
Jones, Larry E.
c23ebdbc-fa09-473b-8e28-693fe6a94248
Schoonbroodt, Alice
9e83bf4e-5e95-4e7b-9f3e-d6cbb8adc64b
Tertilt, Michèle
cb0fab5d-a76e-497a-baa2-e43f9dd2ab27
1 January 2011
Jones, Larry E.
c23ebdbc-fa09-473b-8e28-693fe6a94248
Schoonbroodt, Alice
9e83bf4e-5e95-4e7b-9f3e-d6cbb8adc64b
Tertilt, Michèle
cb0fab5d-a76e-497a-baa2-e43f9dd2ab27
Jones, Larry E., Schoonbroodt, Alice and Tertilt, Michèle
(2011)
Fertility theories: can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship?
In,
Shoven, John B.
(ed.)
Demography and the Economy (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report).
Chicago Ridge, US.
University of Chicago Press, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In this chapter we revisit the relationship between income and fertility. There is overwhelming empirical evidence that fertility is negatively related to income in most countries at most times. Several theories have been proposed in the literature to explain this somewhat puzzling fact. The most common one is based on the opportunity cost of time being higher for individuals with higher earnings. Alternatively, people might differ in their desire to procreate and accordingly some people invest more in children and less in market-specific human capital and thus have lower earnings. We revisit these and other possible explanations. We find that these theories are not as robust as is commonly believed. That is, several special assumptions are needed to generate the negative relationship. Not all assumptions are equally plausible. Such findings will be useful to distinguish alternative theories. We conclude that further research along these lines is needed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 173863
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/173863
ISBN: 9780226754727
PURE UUID: 061c163e-6248-47c8-b1f7-6fe51a26aec5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Feb 2011 14:37
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 18:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Larry E. Jones
Author:
Alice Schoonbroodt
Author:
Michèle Tertilt
Editor:
John B. Shoven
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics