Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking
Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking
The study aimed to synthesise qualitative studies of lay experiences of medicine taking. Most studies focused on the experience of those not taking their medicine as prescribed, with few considering those who reject their medicines or accept them uncritically. Most were concerned with medicines for chronic illnesses. The synthesis revealed widespread caution about taking medicines and highlighted the lay practice of testing medicines, mainly for adverse effects. Some concerns about medicines cannot be resolved by lay evaluation, however, including worries about dependence, tolerance and addiction, the potential harm from taking medicines on a long-term basis and the possibility of medicines masking other symptoms. Additionally, in some cases medicines had a significant impact on identity, presenting problems of disclosure and stigma. People were found to accept their medicines either passively or actively, or to reject them. Some were coerced into taking medicines. Active accepters might modify their regimens by taking medicines symptomatically or strategically, or by adjusting doses to minimise unwanted consequences, or to make the regimen more acceptable. Many modifications appeared to reflect a desire to minimise the intake of medicines and this was echoed in some peoples’ use of non-pharmacological treatments to either supplant or supplement their medicines. Few discussed regimen changes with their doctors. We conclude that the main reason why people do not take their medicines as prescribed is not because of failings in patients, doctors or systems, but because of concerns about the medicines themselves. On the whole, the findings point to considerable reluctance to take medicine and a preference to take as little as possible. We argue that peoples’ resistance to medicine taking needs to be recognised and that the focus should be on developing ways of making medicines safe, as well as identifying and evaluating the treatments that people often choose in preference to medicines.
medicines, qualitative, synthesis, resistance
133-155
Pound, P.
ee201183-dc29-4e53-b260-1b62f23cdee4
Britten, N.
a90b1b6f-5a45-452c-bb82-6527ed3f9aa7
Morgan, M.
c1a6ed98-7052-4633-a5ab-43ef1663bb8f
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Daker-White, G.
393856b5-b809-4890-b2a9-836543a77356
Campbell, R.
5bd0b46a-6b67-4b0b-8346-b89160239200
July 2005
Pound, P.
ee201183-dc29-4e53-b260-1b62f23cdee4
Britten, N.
a90b1b6f-5a45-452c-bb82-6527ed3f9aa7
Morgan, M.
c1a6ed98-7052-4633-a5ab-43ef1663bb8f
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Pope, C.
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Daker-White, G.
393856b5-b809-4890-b2a9-836543a77356
Campbell, R.
5bd0b46a-6b67-4b0b-8346-b89160239200
Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker-White, G. and Campbell, R.
(2005)
Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking.
Social Science & Medicine, 61 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063).
Abstract
The study aimed to synthesise qualitative studies of lay experiences of medicine taking. Most studies focused on the experience of those not taking their medicine as prescribed, with few considering those who reject their medicines or accept them uncritically. Most were concerned with medicines for chronic illnesses. The synthesis revealed widespread caution about taking medicines and highlighted the lay practice of testing medicines, mainly for adverse effects. Some concerns about medicines cannot be resolved by lay evaluation, however, including worries about dependence, tolerance and addiction, the potential harm from taking medicines on a long-term basis and the possibility of medicines masking other symptoms. Additionally, in some cases medicines had a significant impact on identity, presenting problems of disclosure and stigma. People were found to accept their medicines either passively or actively, or to reject them. Some were coerced into taking medicines. Active accepters might modify their regimens by taking medicines symptomatically or strategically, or by adjusting doses to minimise unwanted consequences, or to make the regimen more acceptable. Many modifications appeared to reflect a desire to minimise the intake of medicines and this was echoed in some peoples’ use of non-pharmacological treatments to either supplant or supplement their medicines. Few discussed regimen changes with their doctors. We conclude that the main reason why people do not take their medicines as prescribed is not because of failings in patients, doctors or systems, but because of concerns about the medicines themselves. On the whole, the findings point to considerable reluctance to take medicine and a preference to take as little as possible. We argue that peoples’ resistance to medicine taking needs to be recognised and that the focus should be on developing ways of making medicines safe, as well as identifying and evaluating the treatments that people often choose in preference to medicines.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 2005
Keywords:
medicines, qualitative, synthesis, resistance
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 17389
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/17389
ISSN: 0277-9536
PURE UUID: 99705416-4029-4799-830c-1f3a9d7cea41
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 May 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
P. Pound
Author:
N. Britten
Author:
M. Morgan
Author:
C. Pope
Author:
G. Daker-White
Author:
R. Campbell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics