Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study
Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) will play a key role in any response to pandemic influenza, and the UK healthcare system's ability to cope during an influenza pandemic will depend, to a large extent, on the number of HCWs who are able and willing to work through the crisis. UK emergency planning will be improved if planners have a better understanding of the reasons UK HCWs may have for their absenteeism, and what might motivate them to work during an influenza pandemic.
This paper reports the results of a qualitative study that explored UK HCWs' views (n = 64) about working during an influenza pandemic, in order to identify factors that might influence their willingness and ability to work and to identify potential sources of any perceived duty on HCWs to work.
Methods: A qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 9) and interviews (n = 5).
Results: HCWs across a range of roles and grades tended to feel motivated by a sense of obligation to work through an influenza pandemic. A number of significant barriers that may prevent them from doing so were also identified. Perceived barriers to the ability to work included being ill oneself, transport difficulties, and childcare responsibilities. Perceived barriers to the willingness to work included: prioritising the wellbeing of family members; a lack of trust in, and goodwill towards, the NHS; a lack of information about the risks and what is expected of them during the crisis; fear of litigation; and the feeling that employers do not take the needs of staff seriously. Barriers to ability and barriers to willingness, however, are difficult to separate out.
Conclusion: Although our participants tended to feel a general obligation to work during an influenza pandemic, there are barriers to working, which, if generalisable, may significantly reduce the NHS workforce during a pandemic. The barriers identified are both barriers to willingness and to ability. This suggests that pandemic planning needs to take into account the possibility that staff may be absent for reasons beyond those currently anticipated in UK planning documents. In particular, staff who are physically able to attend work may nonetheless be unwilling to do so. Although there are some barriers that cannot be mitigated by employers (such as illness, transport infrastructure etc.), there are a number of remedial steps that can be taken to lesson the impact of others (providing accommodation, building reciprocity, provision of information and guidance etc). We suggest that barriers to working lie along an ability/willingness continuum, and that absenteeism may be reduced by taking steps to prevent barriers to willingness becoming perceived barriers to ability.
56
Ives, Jonathan
1893eb4c-decb-463a-a45c-ee05183db6df
Greenfield, Sheila
a983610e-aa36-442b-9f11-9af5721d7542
Parry, Jayne M
e1824f38-316e-42b5-84b2-9ebab7052414
Draper, Heather
d3efb1a7-0556-4685-8c4b-482a29de0f96
Gratus, Christine
8abfc960-83f9-4a71-87df-68aa2ee91b17
Petts, Judith
c2b0c58d-c78d-4f2e-9bec-fa4e23d72ef6
Sorell, Tom
a66ce3fd-a193-4cc9-96a6-828cd32ba448
Wilson, Sue
6fd6c8e9-2e06-4eff-a081-feecf4d173ae
12 February 2009
Ives, Jonathan
1893eb4c-decb-463a-a45c-ee05183db6df
Greenfield, Sheila
a983610e-aa36-442b-9f11-9af5721d7542
Parry, Jayne M
e1824f38-316e-42b5-84b2-9ebab7052414
Draper, Heather
d3efb1a7-0556-4685-8c4b-482a29de0f96
Gratus, Christine
8abfc960-83f9-4a71-87df-68aa2ee91b17
Petts, Judith
c2b0c58d-c78d-4f2e-9bec-fa4e23d72ef6
Sorell, Tom
a66ce3fd-a193-4cc9-96a6-828cd32ba448
Wilson, Sue
6fd6c8e9-2e06-4eff-a081-feecf4d173ae
Ives, Jonathan, Greenfield, Sheila, Parry, Jayne M, Draper, Heather, Gratus, Christine, Petts, Judith, Sorell, Tom and Wilson, Sue
(2009)
Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study.
BMC Public Health, 9 (1), .
(doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-56).
Abstract
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) will play a key role in any response to pandemic influenza, and the UK healthcare system's ability to cope during an influenza pandemic will depend, to a large extent, on the number of HCWs who are able and willing to work through the crisis. UK emergency planning will be improved if planners have a better understanding of the reasons UK HCWs may have for their absenteeism, and what might motivate them to work during an influenza pandemic.
This paper reports the results of a qualitative study that explored UK HCWs' views (n = 64) about working during an influenza pandemic, in order to identify factors that might influence their willingness and ability to work and to identify potential sources of any perceived duty on HCWs to work.
Methods: A qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 9) and interviews (n = 5).
Results: HCWs across a range of roles and grades tended to feel motivated by a sense of obligation to work through an influenza pandemic. A number of significant barriers that may prevent them from doing so were also identified. Perceived barriers to the ability to work included being ill oneself, transport difficulties, and childcare responsibilities. Perceived barriers to the willingness to work included: prioritising the wellbeing of family members; a lack of trust in, and goodwill towards, the NHS; a lack of information about the risks and what is expected of them during the crisis; fear of litigation; and the feeling that employers do not take the needs of staff seriously. Barriers to ability and barriers to willingness, however, are difficult to separate out.
Conclusion: Although our participants tended to feel a general obligation to work during an influenza pandemic, there are barriers to working, which, if generalisable, may significantly reduce the NHS workforce during a pandemic. The barriers identified are both barriers to willingness and to ability. This suggests that pandemic planning needs to take into account the possibility that staff may be absent for reasons beyond those currently anticipated in UK planning documents. In particular, staff who are physically able to attend work may nonetheless be unwilling to do so. Although there are some barriers that cannot be mitigated by employers (such as illness, transport infrastructure etc.), there are a number of remedial steps that can be taken to lesson the impact of others (providing accommodation, building reciprocity, provision of information and guidance etc). We suggest that barriers to working lie along an ability/willingness continuum, and that absenteeism may be reduced by taking steps to prevent barriers to willingness becoming perceived barriers to ability.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 12 February 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 174723
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/174723
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: 5d34dc10-65cc-495b-add0-37d81e6ef527
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2011 10:29
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Ives
Author:
Sheila Greenfield
Author:
Jayne M Parry
Author:
Heather Draper
Author:
Christine Gratus
Author:
Judith Petts
Author:
Tom Sorell
Author:
Sue Wilson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics