The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Accommodating change? An investigation of the impacts of government contracting processes on third sector providers of homelessness services in South East England

Accommodating change? An investigation of the impacts of government contracting processes on third sector providers of homelessness services in South East England
Accommodating change? An investigation of the impacts of government contracting processes on third sector providers of homelessness services in South East England
This study investigates the impacts of government contracting on third sector providers of services for single homeless people in Southampton and Hampshire, in South East England. It focuses particularly on tendering and quality measurement. 24 interviews were conducted with representatives of 21 third sector organisations (TSOs) and a further two with local government representatives. Quantitative data were used to describe the characteristics of the TSOs. Different TSOs experienced and responded to government contracting in different ways, and a typology was therefore developed which categorised the organisations into one of four types: Comfortable Contractors; Compliant Contractors; Cautious Contractors; and Community-based Non-contractors.

Tendering and quality measurement consumed significant amounts of time and required TSOs to access legal and tender-writing expertise. This was more problematic for the smaller Cautious Contractors, whereas larger TSOs with multiple contracts could meet the requirements more cost-efficiently. The quality measurement processes introduced as part of the Supporting People programme were deemed to have considerably improved standards. However, there were concerns that the emphasis on achieving measurable outcomes and moving clients on within a specified time could lead to the neglect of less tangible aspects such as improved self-esteem, and did not take sufficient account of longer term outcomes for clients.

The impacts of contracting were ambiguous and varied amongst the different types of providers. However, the commissioning processes seemed to favour larger, more professionalised TSOs, which exhibited fewer of the distinctive characteristics upon which New Labour’s support for third sector involvement in service provision was premised. This points to the need for a more carefully differentiated policy discourse which acknowledges the third sector’s diversity and is more transparent about which types of TSO the government is seeking to engage with for which purposes.
Buckingham, Heather
79c73525-0a93-4af1-a38e-336f7f9057ae
Buckingham, Heather
79c73525-0a93-4af1-a38e-336f7f9057ae
Mohan, John
01d0f96b-aee7-4f4d-ad3f-e177231005f6
Roth, Silke
cd4e63d8-bd84-45c1-b317-5850d2a362b6

Buckingham, Heather (2010) Accommodating change? An investigation of the impacts of government contracting processes on third sector providers of homelessness services in South East England. University of Southampton, School of Social Sciences: Sociology and Social Policy, Doctoral Thesis, 294pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of government contracting on third sector providers of services for single homeless people in Southampton and Hampshire, in South East England. It focuses particularly on tendering and quality measurement. 24 interviews were conducted with representatives of 21 third sector organisations (TSOs) and a further two with local government representatives. Quantitative data were used to describe the characteristics of the TSOs. Different TSOs experienced and responded to government contracting in different ways, and a typology was therefore developed which categorised the organisations into one of four types: Comfortable Contractors; Compliant Contractors; Cautious Contractors; and Community-based Non-contractors.

Tendering and quality measurement consumed significant amounts of time and required TSOs to access legal and tender-writing expertise. This was more problematic for the smaller Cautious Contractors, whereas larger TSOs with multiple contracts could meet the requirements more cost-efficiently. The quality measurement processes introduced as part of the Supporting People programme were deemed to have considerably improved standards. However, there were concerns that the emphasis on achieving measurable outcomes and moving clients on within a specified time could lead to the neglect of less tangible aspects such as improved self-esteem, and did not take sufficient account of longer term outcomes for clients.

The impacts of contracting were ambiguous and varied amongst the different types of providers. However, the commissioning processes seemed to favour larger, more professionalised TSOs, which exhibited fewer of the distinctive characteristics upon which New Labour’s support for third sector involvement in service provision was premised. This points to the need for a more carefully differentiated policy discourse which acknowledges the third sector’s diversity and is more transparent about which types of TSO the government is seeking to engage with for which purposes.

Text
Buckingham_Thesis_2010.pdf - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: February 2010
Organisations: University of Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 174795
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/174795
PURE UUID: 67d6a206-aed0-4d36-ad3e-3ef5f72c9066
ORCID for Silke Roth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-0505

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 May 2011 14:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Contributors

Author: Heather Buckingham
Thesis advisor: John Mohan
Thesis advisor: Silke Roth ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×