How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?
How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?
Background:? recent legislation has sought to improve the information printed on packaged foods relevant to the safety of food allergic consumers. We aimed to understand the complex risk assessment decisions made by peanut and nut-allergic adults when purchasing food, with particular reference to use of printed package information.
Methods:? the behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop, followed by a semi-structured interview. During the interview they were given 13 potentially problematic packaged foods, and asked if they would purchase the product and what their reasons were. Transcribed data from the shop, interview and 13-product task were analysed to explore use of allergy advice boxes, ingredients lists and other packaging information.
Results:? some participants used the ingredients list as their primary check for allergens, but most used the allergy advice box. Package-based information was generally considered reliable, but some supermarket and brand labels were trusted more than others. Images and product names were used to draw inferences about the presence of nuts. A number of improvements were suggested by participants, particularly a request for more 'nut free' labelling.
Conclusions:? food labels were used in conjunction with nonpacket-based strategies (e.g. previous experience) to make choices. External factors (e.g. trust of manufacturer) informed interpretation of and confidence in labels. Images and product names, not intended by manufacturers as an allergen risk assessment aid, were also used to inform choices
969-978
Barnett, J.
62424a69-fdcd-4304-9f91-3c21e01ed786
Leftwich, J.
40421ff9-42c4-448d-9ca8-b9d13238ed06
Muncer, K.
651004ec-eb40-4904-8c50-48519ade9147
Grimshaw, K.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
Shepherd, R
8c8973d7-4047-443f-a8b9-5453914bad8d
Raats, M.M.
795529c1-c4c7-45b2-8b83-342123fd6443
Gowland, M.H.
5821ba76-14f0-47b9-811f-6ad94d8d5f13
Lucas, J.S.
5cb3546c-87b2-4e59-af48-402076e25313
July 2011
Barnett, J.
62424a69-fdcd-4304-9f91-3c21e01ed786
Leftwich, J.
40421ff9-42c4-448d-9ca8-b9d13238ed06
Muncer, K.
651004ec-eb40-4904-8c50-48519ade9147
Grimshaw, K.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
Shepherd, R
8c8973d7-4047-443f-a8b9-5453914bad8d
Raats, M.M.
795529c1-c4c7-45b2-8b83-342123fd6443
Gowland, M.H.
5821ba76-14f0-47b9-811f-6ad94d8d5f13
Lucas, J.S.
5cb3546c-87b2-4e59-af48-402076e25313
Barnett, J., Leftwich, J., Muncer, K., Grimshaw, K., Shepherd, R, Raats, M.M., Gowland, M.H. and Lucas, J.S.
(2011)
How do peanut and nut-allergic consumers use information on the packaging to avoid allergens?
Allergy, 66 (7), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02563.x).
(PMID:21320134)
Abstract
Background:? recent legislation has sought to improve the information printed on packaged foods relevant to the safety of food allergic consumers. We aimed to understand the complex risk assessment decisions made by peanut and nut-allergic adults when purchasing food, with particular reference to use of printed package information.
Methods:? the behaviour and 'thinking aloud' of 32 participants were recorded during their normal food shop, followed by a semi-structured interview. During the interview they were given 13 potentially problematic packaged foods, and asked if they would purchase the product and what their reasons were. Transcribed data from the shop, interview and 13-product task were analysed to explore use of allergy advice boxes, ingredients lists and other packaging information.
Results:? some participants used the ingredients list as their primary check for allergens, but most used the allergy advice box. Package-based information was generally considered reliable, but some supermarket and brand labels were trusted more than others. Images and product names were used to draw inferences about the presence of nuts. A number of improvements were suggested by participants, particularly a request for more 'nut free' labelling.
Conclusions:? food labels were used in conjunction with nonpacket-based strategies (e.g. previous experience) to make choices. External factors (e.g. trust of manufacturer) informed interpretation of and confidence in labels. Images and product names, not intended by manufacturers as an allergen risk assessment aid, were also used to inform choices
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 174863
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/174863
ISSN: 0105-4538
PURE UUID: 96e77078-2459-4257-8836-317ad9fa748d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Feb 2011 14:19
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Barnett
Author:
J. Leftwich
Author:
K. Muncer
Author:
R Shepherd
Author:
M.M. Raats
Author:
M.H. Gowland
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics