The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reasons renal patients give for deciding not to dialyse: prospective qualitative interview study

Reasons renal patients give for deciding not to dialyse: prospective qualitative interview study
Reasons renal patients give for deciding not to dialyse: prospective qualitative interview study
Background: as the population ages, sicker patients often with multiple comorbidities are presenting in renal clinics. Some are deciding not to embark on dialysis. The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the decision that some patients make not to embark on dialysis.

Methods: naturally occurring qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 patients and 17 caregivers managed within a Renal Supportive Care Service in an acute NHS Trust in London

Results: several patients believed they had made an informed and autonomous decision, either on or against the advice of their doctor (n 5 17); some felt that they had no option but to refuse dialysis treatment, as it would not have been of benefit and might ultimately cause their death (n 5 7); some stated they had decided to opt for medication rather than dialysis 3 times a week and seemed to believe that either option would lead to the same outcome (n 5 2), and some felt there had been no decision to be made (n 5 4).

Conclusions: prior to this study, little was known about those who decide not to embark on dialysis and how they make this decision. It cannot be presumed that decisions made by patients are fully understood and free from inappropriate professional or family influence, and the decision needs to be regularly revisited to check patients' and caregivers' understanding and to allow for reversal of the decision if fitting. There is a need to understand how service providers can help to ensure that such decisions are informed and supported by the best available supportive care thereafter
0090-2934
82-89
Noble, Helen
65485329-4bed-4f9b-96c1-26e7f91e531f
Meyer, Julienne
c4fc2052-b132-4749-9df3-41f012d7e90f
Bridges, Jackie
8352b54c-c34f-430b-b9fb-107a1f2f4e28
Kelly, Daniel
10b0a4eb-fd29-4110-81da-92700153149e
Johnson, Barbara
4fb4f990-a256-402d-8ca2-53182692dc0a
Noble, Helen
65485329-4bed-4f9b-96c1-26e7f91e531f
Meyer, Julienne
c4fc2052-b132-4749-9df3-41f012d7e90f
Bridges, Jackie
8352b54c-c34f-430b-b9fb-107a1f2f4e28
Kelly, Daniel
10b0a4eb-fd29-4110-81da-92700153149e
Johnson, Barbara
4fb4f990-a256-402d-8ca2-53182692dc0a

Noble, Helen, Meyer, Julienne, Bridges, Jackie, Kelly, Daniel and Johnson, Barbara (2008) Reasons renal patients give for deciding not to dialyse: prospective qualitative interview study. Dialysis & Transplantation, 38 (3), 82-89. (doi:10.1002/dat.20288).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: as the population ages, sicker patients often with multiple comorbidities are presenting in renal clinics. Some are deciding not to embark on dialysis. The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the decision that some patients make not to embark on dialysis.

Methods: naturally occurring qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 patients and 17 caregivers managed within a Renal Supportive Care Service in an acute NHS Trust in London

Results: several patients believed they had made an informed and autonomous decision, either on or against the advice of their doctor (n 5 17); some felt that they had no option but to refuse dialysis treatment, as it would not have been of benefit and might ultimately cause their death (n 5 7); some stated they had decided to opt for medication rather than dialysis 3 times a week and seemed to believe that either option would lead to the same outcome (n 5 2), and some felt there had been no decision to be made (n 5 4).

Conclusions: prior to this study, little was known about those who decide not to embark on dialysis and how they make this decision. It cannot be presumed that decisions made by patients are fully understood and free from inappropriate professional or family influence, and the decision needs to be regularly revisited to check patients' and caregivers' understanding and to allow for reversal of the decision if fitting. There is a need to understand how service providers can help to ensure that such decisions are informed and supported by the best available supportive care thereafter

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 175639
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/175639
ISSN: 0090-2934
PURE UUID: 7b81f6e0-f37c-4619-8026-ea36238581ac

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Feb 2011 10:25
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Helen Noble
Author: Julienne Meyer
Author: Jackie Bridges
Author: Daniel Kelly
Author: Barbara Johnson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×