The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Debriefing to placebo allocation: A phenomenological study of participants’ experiences in a randomized clinical trial. Conference paper presented at ECIM 2010.

Record type: Article

Question: Concealment is integral to placebo-controlled clinical trials and insures that participants remain blind to whether they are receiving real (verum) or dummy (placebo) treatment. While participants are routinely informed about and consent to be randomised to verum or placebo, they are typically never told which treatment they actually received: they are not debriefed to treatment allocation. Participants’ experiences of this aspect of trials have not been well-described.

Methods: We therefore conducted an idiographic phenomenological study of four participants’ experiences of being blinded to and then debriefed to placebo allocation in a placebo-controlled clinical trial (conducted in the USA). Four participants in a trial of acupuncture for IBS were interviewed before, during, and after receiving a course of placebo treatments over 6 weeks. During the final interview they were debriefed to placebo allocation.

Results: Each participant's experiences of being blinded to and then debriefed to placebo allocation are described in depth using a phenomenological approach based on the Sheffield School. All four thought they had received real acupuncture, and based their belief on a combination of embodied experiences during and after treatments, and their perceptions of their acupuncturists. They were all surprised to be told they had placebo, and did not unquestionably accept this news. Instead, they developed revised explanations that reconciled their lived experiences (of real acupuncture) with the conflicting news (of placebo acupuncture) from the interviewer.

Conclusions: Our participants’ experiences of blinding and debriefing were embodied, related to their goals in undertaking the study, and social – embedded in trusting and valued relationships with acupuncturists, told to others outside the study, and described to an interviewer. This work suggests that debriefing to placebo allocation can and should be managed sensitively to facilitate positive outcomes for participants: further research should focus on developing best practice in this area.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Bishop, F., Jacobsen, E., Shaw, J. and Kaptchuk, T. (2010) Debriefing to placebo allocation: A phenomenological study of participants’ experiences in a randomized clinical trial. Conference paper presented at ECIM 2010. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2, (4), p. 199. (doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2010.09.058).

More information

Published date: December 2010
Additional Information: Presented at the 3rd European Congress on Integrative Medicine, Berlin

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 176159
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/176159
ISSN: 1876-3820
PURE UUID: 1d3f956a-d37b-4996-8900-b05fe642069a
ORCID for F. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Mar 2011 16:19
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: F. Bishop ORCID iD
Author: E. Jacobsen
Author: J. Shaw
Author: T. Kaptchuk

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×