Acupuncture for osteoarthritis: A qualitative analysis to interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial. Conference paper presented at ECIM 2009.
Acupuncture for osteoarthritis: A qualitative analysis to interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial. Conference paper presented at ECIM 2009.
Objective: To develop explanations for the quantitative findings of an RCT by systematically interrogating data from the nested qualitative study.
Design: Qualitative study (narrative interviews and framework analysis) nested within an RCT.
Participants: A total of 27 RCT participants were purposively selected to interview, to encompass all treatment conditions.
Setting: The single-blind RCT examined the efficacy of real acupuncture for pain relief in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomised to 3 treatment conditions (real acupuncture vs 2 placebo treatments) and 2 consultation conditions (empathic vs non-empathic). The study involved 3 experienced acupuncturists who delivered all interventions.
Findings: Interviewees were active participants who sought to make meaning of their experiences in the trial. They wanted to try acupuncture and thought it might benefit them, thus subverting patient equipoise. Interviewees sought to determine whether they were receiving real treatment and drew on cues including perceived outcomes, treatment sensations, and practitioner behaviours. Evidence for a reciprocal process is outlined in which interviewees’ perceptions of treatment veracity and outcomes were mutually reinforcing. The most successful practitioner was seen as an authoritative doctor. Interviewees reported colluding with practitioners in non-empathic consultations, and inferred empathy from experiences associated with the trial but outside the protocol treatments.
Conclusions: This nested qualitative analysis offered novel insights into the RCT findings that would not have been possible from the quantitative data alone. Conceptualising and understanding RCT subjects as active participants has important implications for trial design particularly for interventions such as acupuncture when equipoise is unlikely.
214-215
Bishop, F.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Hill, C.
f8e9fa28-fd5a-4ad1-9c1d-b1acd846c94e
White, P.
7af189b9-069f-440f-bbef-78c56ae40bb6
Walker, J.
991d793e-2b84-403b-a9ee-0a802b90f06d
Lewith, G.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
December 2009
Bishop, F.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Hill, C.
f8e9fa28-fd5a-4ad1-9c1d-b1acd846c94e
White, P.
7af189b9-069f-440f-bbef-78c56ae40bb6
Walker, J.
991d793e-2b84-403b-a9ee-0a802b90f06d
Lewith, G.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Bishop, F., Hill, C., White, P., Walker, J. and Lewith, G.
(2009)
Acupuncture for osteoarthritis: A qualitative analysis to interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial. Conference paper presented at ECIM 2009.
European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 1 (4), .
(doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2009.08.135).
Abstract
Objective: To develop explanations for the quantitative findings of an RCT by systematically interrogating data from the nested qualitative study.
Design: Qualitative study (narrative interviews and framework analysis) nested within an RCT.
Participants: A total of 27 RCT participants were purposively selected to interview, to encompass all treatment conditions.
Setting: The single-blind RCT examined the efficacy of real acupuncture for pain relief in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomised to 3 treatment conditions (real acupuncture vs 2 placebo treatments) and 2 consultation conditions (empathic vs non-empathic). The study involved 3 experienced acupuncturists who delivered all interventions.
Findings: Interviewees were active participants who sought to make meaning of their experiences in the trial. They wanted to try acupuncture and thought it might benefit them, thus subverting patient equipoise. Interviewees sought to determine whether they were receiving real treatment and drew on cues including perceived outcomes, treatment sensations, and practitioner behaviours. Evidence for a reciprocal process is outlined in which interviewees’ perceptions of treatment veracity and outcomes were mutually reinforcing. The most successful practitioner was seen as an authoritative doctor. Interviewees reported colluding with practitioners in non-empathic consultations, and inferred empathy from experiences associated with the trial but outside the protocol treatments.
Conclusions: This nested qualitative analysis offered novel insights into the RCT findings that would not have been possible from the quantitative data alone. Conceptualising and understanding RCT subjects as active participants has important implications for trial design particularly for interventions such as acupuncture when equipoise is unlikely.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2009
Additional Information:
Presented at the 2nd European Congress on Integrative Medicine, Berlin
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 176239
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/176239
ISSN: 1876-3820
PURE UUID: cfa0b3ed-fbf1-4165-a748-ca54cc1d920d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Mar 2011 11:42
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
C. Hill
Author:
P. White
Author:
J. Walker
Author:
G. Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics