The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mean-making and efficacy research: A qualitative analysis to interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso

Bishop, F.L., Hill, C, White, P, Walker, J and Lewith, G.T. (2010) Mean-making and efficacy research: A qualitative analysis to interpret the results of a randomised controlled trial. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso ICCMR 2010 Abstract Book, 0-007.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop explanations for the quantitative findings of an RCT by systematically interrogating data from the nested qualitative study (narrative interviews, framework analysis).
Methods: The single-blind RCT examined the efficacy of real acupuncture (and empathic consultations) for pain relief in hip and knee osteoarthritis. 27 RCT participants were purposively selected to interview, to encompass all treatment conditions.
Results: Interviewees were active participants who sought to make meaning of their experiences in the trial. They wanted acupuncture and thought it might benefit them, thus subverting patient equipoise. Interviewees sought to determine whether they were receiving real treatment and drew on cues including perceived outcomes, treatment sensations, and practitioner behaviours. We outline evidence for a reciprocal process in which interviewees’ perceptions of treatment veracity and outcomes were mutually reinforcing. The most successful practitioner was seen as an authoritative doctor. Interviewees reported colluding with practitioners in nonempathic consultations, and inferred empathy from experiences associated with the trial but outside the protocol treatments.
Conclusion : This nested qualitative analysis offered novel insights into the RCT findings that would not have been possible from the quantitative data alone. Conceptualising and understanding RCT subjects as active participants has important implications for trial design.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 19 May 2010
Venue - Dates: 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Norway, 2010-05-19

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 176249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/176249
PURE UUID: 973eba55-c9d1-4c5d-a9c9-f422a1824b2a
ORCID for F.L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2011 10:52
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 12:08

Export record

Contributors

Author: F.L. Bishop ORCID iD
Author: C Hill
Author: P White
Author: J Walker
Author: G.T. Lewith

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×