The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How do patients choose an acupuncturist? A mixed methods study. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso

How do patients choose an acupuncturist? A mixed methods study. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso
How do patients choose an acupuncturist? A mixed methods study. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso
Purpose: Patients can have difficulties choosing acupuncturists in the UK as they are not currently subject to statutory regulation. A qualitative study explored patients’ experiences of acupuncture. A quantitative vignette study investigated the impact of patient
gender and practitioner factors (gender, training location and qualifications) on choice of acupuncturist.
Methods: Qualitative study: 35 acupuncture
patients (maximum variation sampling) participated in semistructured interviews about their acupuncture experiences (thematic analysis).
Quantitative study: 83 participants imagined wanting to consult an acupuncturist for back pain. They rated 8
fictional acupuncturists.
Results: Patients wanted qualified, personable acupuncturists and valued recommendations from trusted
others. Without such recommendations, potential patients preferred female acupuncturists (F(1,76)=30.63,
p<.01) with medical qualifications (F(1,76)=125.72, p<.01), who trained in China (F(1,76)=8.53), p<.01).
Conclusions: The decision to consult a particular acupuncturist is not straight forward. Acupuncturists’
trustworthiness and authenticity are important to (potential) patients; practitioner gender also influenced
preferences in our participants. Patients need to be informed about forthcoming statutory regulation in
CAM and its implications; GPs might be able to better support their patients wanting to consult acupuncturists.
0-135
Bishop, F.L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Massey, Y
0715a8c5-e801-44fe-bc16-b807e9e045f7
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Lewith, G.T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Bishop, F.L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Massey, Y
0715a8c5-e801-44fe-bc16-b807e9e045f7
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Lewith, G.T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Bishop, F.L., Massey, Y, Yardley, L. and Lewith, G.T. (2010) How do patients choose an acupuncturist? A mixed methods study. Presented at the 5th International Congress on Complementary Medicine, Tromso. ICCMR 2010 Abstract Book, 0-135.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: Patients can have difficulties choosing acupuncturists in the UK as they are not currently subject to statutory regulation. A qualitative study explored patients’ experiences of acupuncture. A quantitative vignette study investigated the impact of patient
gender and practitioner factors (gender, training location and qualifications) on choice of acupuncturist.
Methods: Qualitative study: 35 acupuncture
patients (maximum variation sampling) participated in semistructured interviews about their acupuncture experiences (thematic analysis).
Quantitative study: 83 participants imagined wanting to consult an acupuncturist for back pain. They rated 8
fictional acupuncturists.
Results: Patients wanted qualified, personable acupuncturists and valued recommendations from trusted
others. Without such recommendations, potential patients preferred female acupuncturists (F(1,76)=30.63,
p<.01) with medical qualifications (F(1,76)=125.72, p<.01), who trained in China (F(1,76)=8.53), p<.01).
Conclusions: The decision to consult a particular acupuncturist is not straight forward. Acupuncturists’
trustworthiness and authenticity are important to (potential) patients; practitioner gender also influenced
preferences in our participants. Patients need to be informed about forthcoming statutory regulation in
CAM and its implications; GPs might be able to better support their patients wanting to consult acupuncturists.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 19 May 2010
Venue - Dates: ICCMR 2010: 5th International Congress on Complementary MedicineResearch, Tromso, Norway, 2010-05-18

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 176255
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/176255
PURE UUID: 7d7163f3-2fbc-445d-8261-40a03f1d717a
ORCID for F.L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662
ORCID for L. Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2011 10:31
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 03:50

Export record

Contributors

Author: F.L. Bishop ORCID iD
Author: Y Massey
Author: L. Yardley ORCID iD
Author: G.T. Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×