The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Designing optimal sampling configurations with ordinary and indicator kriging

Designing optimal sampling configurations with ordinary and indicator kriging
Designing optimal sampling configurations with ordinary and indicator kriging
The objective of this paper is to examine the applicability of two geostatistical approaches, ordinary kriging (OK) and ordinary indicator kriging (IK), to the design of optimal sampling strategies. A by-product of OK is the OK variance. The OK variance is a measure of confidence in estimates. It is a function of (i) the form of spatial variability of the data (modelled, for example, by the variogram), and (ii) the spatial configuration of the samples. The disadvantage of the OK variance is that it is independent of the magnitude of data values locally. For a given sampling configuration, the OK variance will be the same irrespective of the data values; thus, if data are measured on a regular grid, the maximum OK variance will be identical; however, much of the data vary locally. An approach that is conditional on the data values would be more suitable in such cases. This paper uses the conditional variance of the conditional cumulative distribution function (ccdf) derived through IK to assess local uncertainty in estimates. Since the conditional variance of the ccdf is conditional on the data values, the problem of OK variance data independence is overcome. Previously, to determine an acceptable sample grid spacing, investigators have plotted the maximum OK variance for a range of sample spacings and used the plot to select a sample spacing that achieved a given precision of estimation; however, where the spatial variability is not stationary across the region of concern, the OK variance will be biased as it is independent of the data values locally. The maximum conditional variance was used in the same way to account for the magnitude of data values as well as the form of spatial variability and the spatial configuration of the data. A photogrammetically derived digital terrain model (DTM) was sampled on a regular grid, and the success of the OK and IK approaches in ascertaining optimal sampling intervals was examined and compared with reference to the DTM. Once the variogram and indicator variograms were computed for the sample data, mathematical models were fitted and the model coefficients were used for kriging. The performance of the two approaches was assessed in three separate ways: (i) The model coefficients were used to ascertain the maximum OK and conditional variance for several sampling intervals; (ii) The DTM was then sampled at several (progressively smaller) spacings, and estimates were made from the samples. The differences between the estimates and the population (that is, the complete DTM) were then computed and the errors using OK and IK were related to the maximum error that was predicted by the OK variance or the conditional variance. The proportion of estimates that fell outside the estimation variances were quantified and the different results compared; (iii) The estimation errors for each grid cell were plotted against the OK variance and conditional variance, and the form of the relationships was assessed. Finally, the implications of using the two approaches were discussed.
Lloyd, C.D.
2d3bd538-2045-4fbb-900c-9f77c386bbc9
Atkinson, P.M.
aaaa51e4-a713-424f-92b0-0568b198f425
Lloyd, C.D.
2d3bd538-2045-4fbb-900c-9f77c386bbc9
Atkinson, P.M.
aaaa51e4-a713-424f-92b0-0568b198f425

Lloyd, C.D. and Atkinson, P.M. (1999) Designing optimal sampling configurations with ordinary and indicator kriging. GeoComputation 99 Fourth International Conference on GeoComputation, Fredericksburg, USA. 24 - 27 Jul 1999.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the applicability of two geostatistical approaches, ordinary kriging (OK) and ordinary indicator kriging (IK), to the design of optimal sampling strategies. A by-product of OK is the OK variance. The OK variance is a measure of confidence in estimates. It is a function of (i) the form of spatial variability of the data (modelled, for example, by the variogram), and (ii) the spatial configuration of the samples. The disadvantage of the OK variance is that it is independent of the magnitude of data values locally. For a given sampling configuration, the OK variance will be the same irrespective of the data values; thus, if data are measured on a regular grid, the maximum OK variance will be identical; however, much of the data vary locally. An approach that is conditional on the data values would be more suitable in such cases. This paper uses the conditional variance of the conditional cumulative distribution function (ccdf) derived through IK to assess local uncertainty in estimates. Since the conditional variance of the ccdf is conditional on the data values, the problem of OK variance data independence is overcome. Previously, to determine an acceptable sample grid spacing, investigators have plotted the maximum OK variance for a range of sample spacings and used the plot to select a sample spacing that achieved a given precision of estimation; however, where the spatial variability is not stationary across the region of concern, the OK variance will be biased as it is independent of the data values locally. The maximum conditional variance was used in the same way to account for the magnitude of data values as well as the form of spatial variability and the spatial configuration of the data. A photogrammetically derived digital terrain model (DTM) was sampled on a regular grid, and the success of the OK and IK approaches in ascertaining optimal sampling intervals was examined and compared with reference to the DTM. Once the variogram and indicator variograms were computed for the sample data, mathematical models were fitted and the model coefficients were used for kriging. The performance of the two approaches was assessed in three separate ways: (i) The model coefficients were used to ascertain the maximum OK and conditional variance for several sampling intervals; (ii) The DTM was then sampled at several (progressively smaller) spacings, and estimates were made from the samples. The differences between the estimates and the population (that is, the complete DTM) were then computed and the errors using OK and IK were related to the maximum error that was predicted by the OK variance or the conditional variance. The proportion of estimates that fell outside the estimation variances were quantified and the different results compared; (iii) The estimation errors for each grid cell were plotted against the OK variance and conditional variance, and the form of the relationships was assessed. Finally, the implications of using the two approaches were discussed.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1999
Venue - Dates: GeoComputation 99 Fourth International Conference on GeoComputation, Fredericksburg, USA, 1999-07-24 - 1999-07-27

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 17662
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/17662
PURE UUID: 64993c07-c14e-4647-b584-c64d3c3eb860

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Oct 2005
Last modified: 22 Jul 2020 16:35

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×