Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review
Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review
This paper reviews claims for methodological innovation in qualitative research. It comprises a review of 57 papers published between 2000-2009 in which claims to innovation in qualitative methods have been made. These papers encompass creative methods, narrative methods, mixed methods, online/e-research methods, focus groups and software tools. The majority of claims of innovation are made for new methods or designs, with the remainder claiming adaptations or adoption of existing methodological innovations. However, the evidence provided of wholly new methodologies or designs was limited, and in several papers such claims turned out to relate either to adaptations to existing methods, or to the transfer and adaptation of methods from other disciplines, primarily from arts and humanities. We argue that over-claiming innovation in the sense of the development of a wholly new methodology or design has a number of important implications that are potentially detrimental to qualitative social science.
methodological innovation, qualitative research, narrative literature review
Economic & Social Research Council
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Pain, Helen
2a19b083-3dd5-483c-99ca-e24bd7e3f8b4
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
January 2010
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Pain, Helen
2a19b083-3dd5-483c-99ca-e24bd7e3f8b4
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
Wiles, Rose, Pain, Helen and Crow, Graham
(2010)
Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review
(NCRM Working Paper Series, 03/10)
Swindon, Borough of, GB.
Economic & Social Research Council
34pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
This paper reviews claims for methodological innovation in qualitative research. It comprises a review of 57 papers published between 2000-2009 in which claims to innovation in qualitative methods have been made. These papers encompass creative methods, narrative methods, mixed methods, online/e-research methods, focus groups and software tools. The majority of claims of innovation are made for new methods or designs, with the remainder claiming adaptations or adoption of existing methodological innovations. However, the evidence provided of wholly new methodologies or designs was limited, and in several papers such claims turned out to relate either to adaptations to existing methods, or to the transfer and adaptation of methods from other disciplines, primarily from arts and humanities. We argue that over-claiming innovation in the sense of the development of a wholly new methodology or design has a number of important implications that are potentially detrimental to qualitative social science.
Text
innovation_in_research_methods_QR_final_submission_nov_2010.doc
- Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: January 2010
Keywords:
methodological innovation, qualitative research, narrative literature review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 178087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/178087
ISSN: 1468-7941
PURE UUID: 33fe4db8-17f5-4932-9609-424b5884bf06
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Mar 2011 15:07
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:45
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Rose Wiles
Author:
Helen Pain
Author:
Graham Crow
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics