Living with a terminal illness: patients' priorities
Living with a terminal illness: patients' priorities
BACKGROUND: Our understanding of terminal illness and its consequences has been predominantly based on models derived from expert definition, rather than the patient's perspective. More recently, quality of life tools have been developed to enable patient choice in responses. However, an even broader approach may be needed to help identify goals for care for patients who are terminally ill.
AIM: The aim of this paper is to report on an exploratory, qualitative study exploring what people living with terminal illness considered were the areas of priority in their lives.
METHODS: Ten people living with terminal cancer were interviewed. Analysis of the interviews incorporated principles of narrative analysis and grounded theory.
FINDINGS: Over 30 categories were identified and collated into five inter-related themes (personal/intrinsic factors, external/extrinsic factors, future issues, perceptions of normality and taking charge) encompassing the issues of importance to all participants. Each theme focused on 'life and living' in relation to life as it was or would be without illness. Practical issues of daily living and the opportunity to address philosophical issues around the meaning of life emerged as important areas. The central theme, 'taking charge', concerned with people's levels of life engagement, was integrally connected to all other themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the way in which health professionals manage patients' involvement in matters such as symptom relief can impact on existential areas of concern. Understanding patients' perspectives in relation to each theme may assist health professionals to develop management strategies appropriate to their needs. The findings challenge some aspects of traditional 'expert-defined' outcome measures. As this was an exploratory study, further work is needed to test and develop the model presented.
611 - 620
Carter, Helen
b76a9d1c-7b0a-4127-85cf-8edf90b1e074
McLeod, Rod
9e404549-b06b-4170-938b-50529564c796
Brander, Penny
cd3263db-b6da-4e09-b8d7-a42904844c30
McPherson, Kath
dc901431-2119-42df-9400-852e4cb46d75
1 March 2004
Carter, Helen
b76a9d1c-7b0a-4127-85cf-8edf90b1e074
McLeod, Rod
9e404549-b06b-4170-938b-50529564c796
Brander, Penny
cd3263db-b6da-4e09-b8d7-a42904844c30
McPherson, Kath
dc901431-2119-42df-9400-852e4cb46d75
Carter, Helen, McLeod, Rod, Brander, Penny and McPherson, Kath
(2004)
Living with a terminal illness: patients' priorities.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45 (6), .
(doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02953.x).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our understanding of terminal illness and its consequences has been predominantly based on models derived from expert definition, rather than the patient's perspective. More recently, quality of life tools have been developed to enable patient choice in responses. However, an even broader approach may be needed to help identify goals for care for patients who are terminally ill.
AIM: The aim of this paper is to report on an exploratory, qualitative study exploring what people living with terminal illness considered were the areas of priority in their lives.
METHODS: Ten people living with terminal cancer were interviewed. Analysis of the interviews incorporated principles of narrative analysis and grounded theory.
FINDINGS: Over 30 categories were identified and collated into five inter-related themes (personal/intrinsic factors, external/extrinsic factors, future issues, perceptions of normality and taking charge) encompassing the issues of importance to all participants. Each theme focused on 'life and living' in relation to life as it was or would be without illness. Practical issues of daily living and the opportunity to address philosophical issues around the meaning of life emerged as important areas. The central theme, 'taking charge', concerned with people's levels of life engagement, was integrally connected to all other themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the way in which health professionals manage patients' involvement in matters such as symptom relief can impact on existential areas of concern. Understanding patients' perspectives in relation to each theme may assist health professionals to develop management strategies appropriate to their needs. The findings challenge some aspects of traditional 'expert-defined' outcome measures. As this was an exploratory study, further work is needed to test and develop the model presented.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 March 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 17850
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/17850
ISSN: 0309-2402
PURE UUID: 6c414396-9ebf-4b0d-ba63-a50288e49f59
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Nov 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Helen Carter
Author:
Rod McLeod
Author:
Penny Brander
Author:
Kath McPherson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics