Proprietary estoppel: a functional analysis
Proprietary estoppel: a functional analysis
This article argues in favour of a functional analysis of proprietary estoppel which focuses on the role of the doctrine in enabling claims to the informal acquisition of property rights in land. The article shows that adopting such an analysis both assists our understanding of two recent decisions of the English House of Lords and helps to resolve issues of taxonomy that arise in relation to the doctrine. A functional analysis both unites the sub-categories of proprietary estoppel into a single principle and distinguishes this principle from other types of estoppel claim. It is suggested, however, that the unification of common law and equitable estoppel remains both possible and desirable as long as ‘unification’ is understood broadly and is not confined to the recognition of a doctrine that is identical in its scope and operation in all cases. It is further shown that despite a lack of discussion of the concept in the House of Lords, unconscionability continues to play a key role in proprietary estoppel and therefore in the informal acquisition of property rights. Unconscionability may now benefit from a closer connection with the other elements of claims which should prevent abuse of the concept and allay concerns of ‘palm-tree justice’.
201-224
Hopkins, Nicholas
275e4580-220b-40e1-bb31-8180a9601736
December 2010
Hopkins, Nicholas
275e4580-220b-40e1-bb31-8180a9601736
Hopkins, Nicholas
(2010)
Proprietary estoppel: a functional analysis.
Journal of Equity, 4 (3), .
Abstract
This article argues in favour of a functional analysis of proprietary estoppel which focuses on the role of the doctrine in enabling claims to the informal acquisition of property rights in land. The article shows that adopting such an analysis both assists our understanding of two recent decisions of the English House of Lords and helps to resolve issues of taxonomy that arise in relation to the doctrine. A functional analysis both unites the sub-categories of proprietary estoppel into a single principle and distinguishes this principle from other types of estoppel claim. It is suggested, however, that the unification of common law and equitable estoppel remains both possible and desirable as long as ‘unification’ is understood broadly and is not confined to the recognition of a doctrine that is identical in its scope and operation in all cases. It is further shown that despite a lack of discussion of the concept in the House of Lords, unconscionability continues to play a key role in proprietary estoppel and therefore in the informal acquisition of property rights. Unconscionability may now benefit from a closer connection with the other elements of claims which should prevent abuse of the concept and allay concerns of ‘palm-tree justice’.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: December 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 178901
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/178901
ISSN: 1833-2137
PURE UUID: c4d98a03-d554-44d2-bf07-e7a88a82d6f2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2011 11:14
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 18:58
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Nicholas Hopkins
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics