The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Filling the accountability gap in housing allocations decision making

Filling the accountability gap in housing allocations decision making
Filling the accountability gap in housing allocations decision making
This article examines how the courts can appropriately oversee the way in which local authorities formulate and implement their housing allocations policies. It locates this discussion within the wider topic of the courts’ long-standing reluctance to become involved in adjudicating cases involving the allocation of resources more generally, as well as the potential for the courts to facilitate citizen participation in decision making, an aspiration that permeated the previous government’s agenda and is apparently also a key influence for the current coalition government. It seeks to identify how the courts can protect both procedural and substantive fairness, in a manner that respects the courts’ constitutional position and institutional competence.
0261-3875
442-446
Laurie, Emma
c1dd220c-d784-4d82-a3ae-c6cdedd48a18
Laurie, Emma
c1dd220c-d784-4d82-a3ae-c6cdedd48a18

Laurie, Emma (2011) Filling the accountability gap in housing allocations decision making. Legal Studies, 31 (3), 442-446. (doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00198.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article examines how the courts can appropriately oversee the way in which local authorities formulate and implement their housing allocations policies. It locates this discussion within the wider topic of the courts’ long-standing reluctance to become involved in adjudicating cases involving the allocation of resources more generally, as well as the potential for the courts to facilitate citizen participation in decision making, an aspiration that permeated the previous government’s agenda and is apparently also a key influence for the current coalition government. It seeks to identify how the courts can protect both procedural and substantive fairness, in a manner that respects the courts’ constitutional position and institutional competence.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2011
Organisations: Southampton Law School, Law

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 178905
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/178905
ISSN: 0261-3875
PURE UUID: 20d07a3f-bfcd-47a8-a5a5-cb47c693ad5c
ORCID for Emma Laurie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2178-1593

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2011 10:27
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×