The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand

Ellis, B. (2002) A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, (5), 562 - 570. (doi:10.1191/0269215502cr513oa).

Record type: Article


OBJECTIVE: To establish the intra- and inter-rater reliability of composite finger flexion (CFF), and to compare this with goniometry.
DESIGN: Fifty-one physiotherapists and occupational therapists took part in the study. The hand of a normal subject was splinted in three different positions. Using a goniometer and a ruler alternately, each therapist measured both the proximal interphalangeal joint and CFF of three digits, following a standardized protocol. This process was repeated three times.
SETTING: Eighteen NHS hospital sites in the UK.
RESULTS: The two measurement methods produced different ranges and standard deviations for each digit. The repeatability coefficient shows that repeated intra-rater goniometric measures fall within 4-5 degrees of each other 95% of the time. Inter-rater goniometric measures fall within 7-9 degrees. Repeated intra-rater CFF measures fall within 5-6 mm of each other, whereas inter-rater fall within 7-9 mm. The influence of occupation, experience in hand therapy, years of practice and routine use were found to have no effect on reliability. Scaling of the two methods of measurement allowed comparison between them to be made. CFF and goniometry are equally reliable when comparing inter-rater reliability, but goniometry displays less variability than composite finger flexion for intra-rater measurements.
CONCLUSION: In this study involving a subject with normal joints, goniometry is more reliable than CFF when only one measurer is involved. However, CFF may be a useful alternative where multiple joint measures are required, or when goniometry is impracticable.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1 August 2002
Keywords: rehabilitation


Local EPrints ID: 17892
ISSN: 0269-2155
PURE UUID: f4c5c03c-af4a-4753-b48b-02ce9909764f
ORCID for B. Ellis: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Oct 2005
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:37

Export record


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.