The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Communication between clinicians and patients with low back pain

Communication between clinicians and patients with low back pain
Communication between clinicians and patients with low back pain
Background and purpose of study: Communication between clinicians and patients forms an integral part of any treatment session. To promote positive treatment outcomes, this communication must be effective. To date, research into back pain management has tended to focus on the nature of interventions, neglecting the vital communication that co-exists.
This study aimed to measure verbal communication between clinicians and patients and identify trends in non-verbal communication. With a clearer understanding of how clinicians and patients interact, it is anticipated that this knowledge can be used to maximise health gain in subsequent treatments.
Methods: Following an assessment, the first follow-up treatment session was video recorded for 21 patients (aged 17-65 years), attending a hospital outpatient physiotherapy clinic. Patients with serious spinal pathology or those, whose first language was not English, were excluded.
Verbal communication during the interaction was measured using the validated Medical Communication Behaviour System (MCBS). Trends in non-verbal behaviour were analysed at 40-second intervals, using Heintzman's classification (smiling, forward leaning, affirmative head nodding, touching and eye gaze). A brief semi-structured interview was undertaken with clinicians to determine the perceived effect of the presence of the video camera.
Results: In 21 treatment sessions, 2055 statements were observed, with clinicians spending approximately twice as long talking as patients. Using the MCBS categories, the majority of clinician and patient interaction related to 'content' behaviours (52% and 26% respectively). For the clinician, this includes history-taking, advice etc. The highest frequency of clinicians' non-verbal behaviour was touch (n=352) and for patients, was eye gaze (n=36).
In a secondary analysis, age, gender and experience of the clinician were all shown to influence the communication that occurred.
Conclusion: Validated outcome measures can be used to analyse the complex communication that occurs between clinicians and patients with back pain. Video recording clinical sessions can provide valuable feedback for clinicians and students on their communication skills.
pain, therapy
0375-9229
p.238
Ellis, S.J.
0cd358ba-1b7f-4ce9-8fe5-4551058564f9
Roberts, L.C.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Ellis, S.J.
0cd358ba-1b7f-4ce9-8fe5-4551058564f9
Roberts, L.C.
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0

Ellis, S.J. and Roberts, L.C. (2003) Communication between clinicians and patients with low back pain. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Proceedings, 85-B (Supp III), p.238.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and purpose of study: Communication between clinicians and patients forms an integral part of any treatment session. To promote positive treatment outcomes, this communication must be effective. To date, research into back pain management has tended to focus on the nature of interventions, neglecting the vital communication that co-exists.
This study aimed to measure verbal communication between clinicians and patients and identify trends in non-verbal communication. With a clearer understanding of how clinicians and patients interact, it is anticipated that this knowledge can be used to maximise health gain in subsequent treatments.
Methods: Following an assessment, the first follow-up treatment session was video recorded for 21 patients (aged 17-65 years), attending a hospital outpatient physiotherapy clinic. Patients with serious spinal pathology or those, whose first language was not English, were excluded.
Verbal communication during the interaction was measured using the validated Medical Communication Behaviour System (MCBS). Trends in non-verbal behaviour were analysed at 40-second intervals, using Heintzman's classification (smiling, forward leaning, affirmative head nodding, touching and eye gaze). A brief semi-structured interview was undertaken with clinicians to determine the perceived effect of the presence of the video camera.
Results: In 21 treatment sessions, 2055 statements were observed, with clinicians spending approximately twice as long talking as patients. Using the MCBS categories, the majority of clinician and patient interaction related to 'content' behaviours (52% and 26% respectively). For the clinician, this includes history-taking, advice etc. The highest frequency of clinicians' non-verbal behaviour was touch (n=352) and for patients, was eye gaze (n=36).
In a secondary analysis, age, gender and experience of the clinician were all shown to influence the communication that occurred.
Conclusion: Validated outcome measures can be used to analyse the complex communication that occurs between clinicians and patients with back pain. Video recording clinical sessions can provide valuable feedback for clinicians and students on their communication skills.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2003
Additional Information: The Society for Back Pain Research. Leeds – 14–15 November, 2002. President – Dr Kim Burton.
Keywords: pain, therapy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 17899
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/17899
ISSN: 0375-9229
PURE UUID: 068d9e05-9485-45be-a084-acb35cf1fdb1
ORCID for L.C. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6696

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Feb 2006
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 02:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: S.J. Ellis
Author: L.C. Roberts ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×