The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival

Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival
Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival
BACKGROUND:

To optimise predictive models for sentinal node biopsy (SNB) positivity, relapse and survival, using clinico-pathological characteristics and osteopontin gene expression in primary melanomas.

METHODS:

A comparison of the clinico-pathological characteristics of SNB positive and negative cases was carried out in 561 melanoma patients. In 199 patients, gene expression in formalin-fixed primary tumours was studied using Illumina's DASL assay. A cross validation approach was used to test prognostic predictive models and receiver operating characteristic curves were produced.

RESULTS:

Independent predictors of SNB positivity were Breslow thickness, mitotic count and tumour site. Osteopontin expression best predicted SNB positivity (P=2.4 × 10??), remaining significant in multivariable analysis. Osteopontin expression, combined with thickness, mitotic count and site, gave the best area under the curve (AUC) to predict SNB positivity (72.6%). Independent predictors of relapse-free survival were SNB status, thickness, site, ulceration and vessel invasion, whereas only SNB status and thickness predicted overall survival. Using clinico-pathological features (thickness, mitotic count, ulceration, vessel invasion, site, age and sex) gave a better AUC to predict relapse (71.0%) and survival (70.0%) than SNB status alone (57.0, 55.0%). In patients with gene expression data, the SNB status combined with the clinico-pathological features produced the best prediction of relapse (72.7%) and survival (69.0%), which was not increased further with osteopontin expression (72.7, 68.0%).

CONCLUSION:

Use of these models should be tested in other data sets in order to improve predictive and prognostic data for patients.
melanoma, prognosis, sentinel node biopsy, formalin-fixed tissue, osteopontin
0007-0920
1229-1236
Mitra, A.
7898fd77-26a8-4802-aee1-a0dc2f5430bb
Conway, C.
1ea36229-9620-434e-be3e-b2d4ab41a7b4
Walker, C.
6fd1ea52-5d26-49cc-bbf0-bf394c3bb3f2
Cook, M.
fd33072f-4549-4c1a-a749-2b3f70c550e9
Powell, B.
12249531-7a0a-490c-800b-6166a5c18f3f
Lobo, S.
16b07554-c600-497d-bb0c-49c7acde9340
Chan, M.
2ebe4633-eb38-471d-a3b6-7fcf3be8ec03
Kissin, M.
ee700d7f-7549-461f-8e5c-5a02825e2078
Layer, G.
92c61ed1-578b-4ef2-8aac-c4414c0e7c28
Smallwood, J.
375a48a1-a7e5-4a63-b9ed-f9e84b359685
Ottensmeier, C.
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Stanley, P.
aa738137-300a-4f1a-938b-66fd4e46ada2
Peach, H.
e290b08c-47cb-4964-9a14-2e9173ede4bc
Chong, H.
42519b67-cab7-494f-9b86-e249f6d1978c
Elliott, F.
c9f9b410-bf1e-4155-a697-e8835797ce4c
Iles, M. M.
5d5b6c16-8cf2-4a06-a268-d765a37c1f2a
Nsengimana, J.
c456bcd8-b395-49f3-8f4f-6ae580bb9b9b
Barrett, J. H.
77d42338-d52d-4bea-ae38-8dee3d684cd1
Bishop, D. T.
42ed51fc-d008-4691-a069-af1866665bd1
Newton-Bishop, J. A.
175dbb14-af05-4606-bda2-b6561097165b
Mitra, A.
7898fd77-26a8-4802-aee1-a0dc2f5430bb
Conway, C.
1ea36229-9620-434e-be3e-b2d4ab41a7b4
Walker, C.
6fd1ea52-5d26-49cc-bbf0-bf394c3bb3f2
Cook, M.
fd33072f-4549-4c1a-a749-2b3f70c550e9
Powell, B.
12249531-7a0a-490c-800b-6166a5c18f3f
Lobo, S.
16b07554-c600-497d-bb0c-49c7acde9340
Chan, M.
2ebe4633-eb38-471d-a3b6-7fcf3be8ec03
Kissin, M.
ee700d7f-7549-461f-8e5c-5a02825e2078
Layer, G.
92c61ed1-578b-4ef2-8aac-c4414c0e7c28
Smallwood, J.
375a48a1-a7e5-4a63-b9ed-f9e84b359685
Ottensmeier, C.
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Stanley, P.
aa738137-300a-4f1a-938b-66fd4e46ada2
Peach, H.
e290b08c-47cb-4964-9a14-2e9173ede4bc
Chong, H.
42519b67-cab7-494f-9b86-e249f6d1978c
Elliott, F.
c9f9b410-bf1e-4155-a697-e8835797ce4c
Iles, M. M.
5d5b6c16-8cf2-4a06-a268-d765a37c1f2a
Nsengimana, J.
c456bcd8-b395-49f3-8f4f-6ae580bb9b9b
Barrett, J. H.
77d42338-d52d-4bea-ae38-8dee3d684cd1
Bishop, D. T.
42ed51fc-d008-4691-a069-af1866665bd1
Newton-Bishop, J. A.
175dbb14-af05-4606-bda2-b6561097165b

Mitra, A., Conway, C., Walker, C., Cook, M., Powell, B., Lobo, S., Chan, M., Kissin, M., Layer, G., Smallwood, J., Ottensmeier, C., Stanley, P., Peach, H., Chong, H., Elliott, F., Iles, M. M., Nsengimana, J., Barrett, J. H., Bishop, D. T. and Newton-Bishop, J. A. (2010) Melanoma sentinel node biopsy and prediction models for relapse and overall survival. British Journal of Cancer, 103 (8), 1229-1236. (doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605849). (PMID:20859289)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To optimise predictive models for sentinal node biopsy (SNB) positivity, relapse and survival, using clinico-pathological characteristics and osteopontin gene expression in primary melanomas.

METHODS:

A comparison of the clinico-pathological characteristics of SNB positive and negative cases was carried out in 561 melanoma patients. In 199 patients, gene expression in formalin-fixed primary tumours was studied using Illumina's DASL assay. A cross validation approach was used to test prognostic predictive models and receiver operating characteristic curves were produced.

RESULTS:

Independent predictors of SNB positivity were Breslow thickness, mitotic count and tumour site. Osteopontin expression best predicted SNB positivity (P=2.4 × 10??), remaining significant in multivariable analysis. Osteopontin expression, combined with thickness, mitotic count and site, gave the best area under the curve (AUC) to predict SNB positivity (72.6%). Independent predictors of relapse-free survival were SNB status, thickness, site, ulceration and vessel invasion, whereas only SNB status and thickness predicted overall survival. Using clinico-pathological features (thickness, mitotic count, ulceration, vessel invasion, site, age and sex) gave a better AUC to predict relapse (71.0%) and survival (70.0%) than SNB status alone (57.0, 55.0%). In patients with gene expression data, the SNB status combined with the clinico-pathological features produced the best prediction of relapse (72.7%) and survival (69.0%), which was not increased further with osteopontin expression (72.7, 68.0%).

CONCLUSION:

Use of these models should be tested in other data sets in order to improve predictive and prognostic data for patients.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 12 October 2010
Keywords: melanoma, prognosis, sentinel node biopsy, formalin-fixed tissue, osteopontin

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 179143
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/179143
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: c6325376-7b3b-4328-bc10-f9e1ffb8a795

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2011 11:50
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Mitra
Author: C. Conway
Author: C. Walker
Author: M. Cook
Author: B. Powell
Author: S. Lobo
Author: M. Chan
Author: M. Kissin
Author: G. Layer
Author: J. Smallwood
Author: C. Ottensmeier
Author: P. Stanley
Author: H. Peach
Author: H. Chong
Author: F. Elliott
Author: M. M. Iles
Author: J. Nsengimana
Author: J. H. Barrett
Author: D. T. Bishop
Author: J. A. Newton-Bishop

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×