The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study

Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study
Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study
Background

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) provides an incentive for practices to establish a cancer register and conduct a review with cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis, but implementation is unknown.

Aim

To describe: (1) implementation of the QOF cancer care review; (2) patients' experiences of primary care over the first 3 years following a cancer diagnosis; (3) patients' views on optimal care; and (4) the views of primary care professionals regarding their cancer care.

Design of study

Qualitative study using thematic analysis and a framework approach.

Setting

Six general practices in the Thames Valley area.

Method

Semi-structured interviews with cancer patients and focus groups with primary care teams.

Results

Thirty-eight adults with 12 different cancer types were interviewed. Seventy-one primary care team members took part in focus groups. Most cancer care reviews are conducted opportunistically. Thirty-five patients had had a review; only two could recall this. Patients saw acknowledgement of their diagnosis and provision of general support as important and not always adequately provided. An active approach and specific review appointment would legitimise the raising of concerns. Primary care teams considered cancer care to be part of their role. GPs emphasised the importance of being able to respond to individual patients' needs and closer links with secondary care to facilitate a more involved role.

Conclusion

Patients and primary care teams believe primary care has an important role to play in cancer care. Cancer care reviews in their current format are not helpful, with considerable scope for improving practice in this area. An invitation to attend a specific appointment at the end of active treatment may aid transition from secondary care and improve satisfaction with follow-up in primary care.
0960-1643
e173-e182
Adams, Eike
6e497017-41e8-4773-b0c9-438b3bb44901
Boulton, Mary
92b1dcba-36f3-49f9-959f-1d1af4576afd
Rose, Peter
5df71431-cc13-43ac-86da-8f26fa607b33
Lund, Susi
239a4d54-13e1-4d69-8e3f-08475c20af47
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Wilson, Sue
6fd6c8e9-2e06-4eff-a081-feecf4d173ae
Watson, Eila
d295228d-d534-4c35-844f-ca8471c169c0
Adams, Eike
6e497017-41e8-4773-b0c9-438b3bb44901
Boulton, Mary
92b1dcba-36f3-49f9-959f-1d1af4576afd
Rose, Peter
5df71431-cc13-43ac-86da-8f26fa607b33
Lund, Susi
239a4d54-13e1-4d69-8e3f-08475c20af47
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Wilson, Sue
6fd6c8e9-2e06-4eff-a081-feecf4d173ae
Watson, Eila
d295228d-d534-4c35-844f-ca8471c169c0

Adams, Eike, Boulton, Mary, Rose, Peter, Lund, Susi, Richardson, Alison, Wilson, Sue and Watson, Eila (2011) Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 61 (585), e173-e182. (doi:10.3399/bjgp11x567108). (PMID:21439175)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) provides an incentive for practices to establish a cancer register and conduct a review with cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis, but implementation is unknown.

Aim

To describe: (1) implementation of the QOF cancer care review; (2) patients' experiences of primary care over the first 3 years following a cancer diagnosis; (3) patients' views on optimal care; and (4) the views of primary care professionals regarding their cancer care.

Design of study

Qualitative study using thematic analysis and a framework approach.

Setting

Six general practices in the Thames Valley area.

Method

Semi-structured interviews with cancer patients and focus groups with primary care teams.

Results

Thirty-eight adults with 12 different cancer types were interviewed. Seventy-one primary care team members took part in focus groups. Most cancer care reviews are conducted opportunistically. Thirty-five patients had had a review; only two could recall this. Patients saw acknowledgement of their diagnosis and provision of general support as important and not always adequately provided. An active approach and specific review appointment would legitimise the raising of concerns. Primary care teams considered cancer care to be part of their role. GPs emphasised the importance of being able to respond to individual patients' needs and closer links with secondary care to facilitate a more involved role.

Conclusion

Patients and primary care teams believe primary care has an important role to play in cancer care. Cancer care reviews in their current format are not helpful, with considerable scope for improving practice in this area. An invitation to attend a specific appointment at the end of active treatment may aid transition from secondary care and improve satisfaction with follow-up in primary care.

Text
Adams_Views_of_cancer_care_reviews_BJGP_2011.pdf - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: April 2011

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 179493
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/179493
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 77dffe72-5596-440c-909c-fd95cea94421
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Apr 2011 15:51
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eike Adams
Author: Mary Boulton
Author: Peter Rose
Author: Susi Lund
Author: Sue Wilson
Author: Eila Watson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×