Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population
Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population
Objective: to evaluate the validity and reliability of an English version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPA). The original Dutch IPA has been shown to load onto five factors.
Design: a validation study.
Setting: outpatients clinics and people's homes.
Subjects: two hundred and thirteen people with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord injury, and general practice attendees, stratified by level of disability (median age 54, 42% male, 58% female). Inclusion criteria: English as first language, aged 18-75, Mental Status Questionnaire score > 6.
Interventions: self- and interviewer-administered outcome measures.
Main measures: IPA, including one new item (66 participants completed the IPA on a second occasion).
Other measures: Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), London Handicap Scale, three domains of the Functional Limitations Profile (FLP): household management, social integration, emotion.
Results: confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the IPA (Normal Fit Index = 0.98, Comparative Fit Index = 0.99), indicating a good fit to the model. Convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by the predicted associations, or lack of, with the exception of a poor association between the 'social life/relationships' IPA subscale and FLP-emotion. Internal reliability of the IPA was confirmed (Cronbach alphas > 0.8; item-total correlations for all subscales > 0.5). Test-retest reliability was confirmed for all items (weighted kappas > 0.6) and subscales (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90).
Conclusions: the English IPA is a valid, reliable and acceptable measure of participation and autonomy in people with a range of conditions and can make a unique and fundamental contribution to outcome assessment. Further research is required to examine the responsiveness of the IPA to change over time, its clinical utility and suitability for use with people from ethnic minorities and with older people.
rehabilitation
793-803
Sibley, A.
afe7cc9d-614e-4cb1-b080-8ca7df54ae40
Kersten, P.
b5c4e49b-d73b-46f1-bdc4-266170562b67
Ward, C.D.
84132179-1f89-4267-87d5-4790eccb4d3c
White, B.
e1ed7af7-d5ea-45ef-b2f5-2c95a83842c4
Mehta, R.
1bf632d1-d058-4861-87ca-ae06a07a938a
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
September 2006
Sibley, A.
afe7cc9d-614e-4cb1-b080-8ca7df54ae40
Kersten, P.
b5c4e49b-d73b-46f1-bdc4-266170562b67
Ward, C.D.
84132179-1f89-4267-87d5-4790eccb4d3c
White, B.
e1ed7af7-d5ea-45ef-b2f5-2c95a83842c4
Mehta, R.
1bf632d1-d058-4861-87ca-ae06a07a938a
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Sibley, A., Kersten, P., Ward, C.D., White, B., Mehta, R. and George, S.
(2006)
Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population.
Clinical Rehabilitation, 20 (9), .
(doi:10.1177/0269215506070808).
(PMID:17005503)
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the validity and reliability of an English version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPA). The original Dutch IPA has been shown to load onto five factors.
Design: a validation study.
Setting: outpatients clinics and people's homes.
Subjects: two hundred and thirteen people with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord injury, and general practice attendees, stratified by level of disability (median age 54, 42% male, 58% female). Inclusion criteria: English as first language, aged 18-75, Mental Status Questionnaire score > 6.
Interventions: self- and interviewer-administered outcome measures.
Main measures: IPA, including one new item (66 participants completed the IPA on a second occasion).
Other measures: Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), London Handicap Scale, three domains of the Functional Limitations Profile (FLP): household management, social integration, emotion.
Results: confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the IPA (Normal Fit Index = 0.98, Comparative Fit Index = 0.99), indicating a good fit to the model. Convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by the predicted associations, or lack of, with the exception of a poor association between the 'social life/relationships' IPA subscale and FLP-emotion. Internal reliability of the IPA was confirmed (Cronbach alphas > 0.8; item-total correlations for all subscales > 0.5). Test-retest reliability was confirmed for all items (weighted kappas > 0.6) and subscales (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90).
Conclusions: the English IPA is a valid, reliable and acceptable measure of participation and autonomy in people with a range of conditions and can make a unique and fundamental contribution to outcome assessment. Further research is required to examine the responsiveness of the IPA to change over time, its clinical utility and suitability for use with people from ethnic minorities and with older people.
Text
793.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Submitted date: 4 April 2005
Published date: September 2006
Keywords:
rehabilitation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18038
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18038
ISSN: 0269-2155
PURE UUID: e4ef497e-caf4-439f-930f-01cd7a187c0e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 May 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A. Sibley
Author:
P. Kersten
Author:
C.D. Ward
Author:
B. White
Author:
R. Mehta
Author:
S. George
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics