The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery

Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery
Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery
This study investigated the psychometric properties of a battery of physical performance tests, characterized physical function in patients with cancer referred for rehabilitation, and provided normative standards against which to compare disease progression and/or future treatment effectiveness. A total of 109 patients with cancer (55 women and 54 men) and 105 control subjects (66 women and 39 men) participated. Subjects completed self-report questionnaires regarding pain, physical function, and fatigue, and also performed nine physical performance tests: the time taken to complete various tasks (picking up coins, tying a belt, reaching up, putting on a sock, standing from sitting, a 50-foot fast walk, a 50-foot walk at preferred speed), the distance walked in 6 minutes, and the distance reached forward while standing were measured. Inter-tester and test-retest reliability was good to excellent for all tests (ICC(11) 0.69 to 0.99). Known group analyses controlling for age were significant (P < 0.001) for all physical performance tests. Control subjects significantly and systematically outperformed those with cancer by a factor of two or three. Examination of the correlation matrices showed relatively low correlations between performance and external measures (r = 0.01 to 0.45). In contrast, correlations among performance measures were generally in the range of r = 0.25 to 0.85. Correlations between self-report of function and performance of functional tests were moderate, suggesting that the two methods of measuring function are complementary and both should be used for assessment and as outcome measures
pain
0885-3924
404 - 414
Simmonds, M.J.
8ab397cc-5c61-404e-9c0e-48858c61996c
Simmonds, M.J.
8ab397cc-5c61-404e-9c0e-48858c61996c

Simmonds, M.J. (2002) Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24 (4), 404 - 414. (doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00502-X).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of a battery of physical performance tests, characterized physical function in patients with cancer referred for rehabilitation, and provided normative standards against which to compare disease progression and/or future treatment effectiveness. A total of 109 patients with cancer (55 women and 54 men) and 105 control subjects (66 women and 39 men) participated. Subjects completed self-report questionnaires regarding pain, physical function, and fatigue, and also performed nine physical performance tests: the time taken to complete various tasks (picking up coins, tying a belt, reaching up, putting on a sock, standing from sitting, a 50-foot fast walk, a 50-foot walk at preferred speed), the distance walked in 6 minutes, and the distance reached forward while standing were measured. Inter-tester and test-retest reliability was good to excellent for all tests (ICC(11) 0.69 to 0.99). Known group analyses controlling for age were significant (P < 0.001) for all physical performance tests. Control subjects significantly and systematically outperformed those with cancer by a factor of two or three. Examination of the correlation matrices showed relatively low correlations between performance and external measures (r = 0.01 to 0.45). In contrast, correlations among performance measures were generally in the range of r = 0.25 to 0.85. Correlations between self-report of function and performance of functional tests were moderate, suggesting that the two methods of measuring function are complementary and both should be used for assessment and as outcome measures

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002
Keywords: pain

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18045
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18045
ISSN: 0885-3924
PURE UUID: d66f80d4-326b-49fa-b095-f864332c0e72

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Nov 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M.J. Simmonds

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×