The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

EuroQol EQ-5D may not adequaltely describe the health of people with disabilities

EuroQol EQ-5D may not adequaltely describe the health of people with disabilities
EuroQol EQ-5D may not adequaltely describe the health of people with disabilities
PURPOSE: To assess whether life-circumstances and factors other than those described in the EuroQol EQ-5D instrument have a systematic influence on how the same EuroQol health-state is valued. METHOD: A simulation exercise whereby health professionals were asked to rate the health-state of 16 case-scenarios. Each case-scenario was designed to describe the same EuroQol health-state but was varied systematically using a 4 by 2 factorial design, in terms of ability to work, ability to perform usual leisure activity, age and type of disability. A convenience sample of 41 health professionals studying towards a postgraduate Diploma in Rehabilitation formed the study group. RESULTS: The average valuation was significantly higher than that derived from a social tariff model. The following factors contributed to a model which explained 10% of the variability in valuation scores: characteristics of the assessor--years of experience, experience with musculoskeletal disorders, and characteristics of the scenario--disability type, ability to work and ability to perform usual leisure activities (beta weights ranged from 0.093 to 0.253). Ability to perform usual leisure activities was associated with the greatest influence on the valuation rating. Additionally, professional type had a significant influence on rating with general practitioners giving significantly lower valuations. CONCLUSIONS: The same health-state, as defined by EuroQol EQ-5D cannot be regarded as describing similar life-circumstances, sufficient to be valued in the same way. Factors specific to the 'valuer' (experience and professional type) and specific to the 'valuee' (disability type, ability to work or perform usual leisure activities) that are not included in the EQ-5D description are significantly associated with different valuation scores. Caution should be used in applying valuations obtained from social tariff models to a disabled population
health, disabilities, disability
0963-8288
281 - 285
Taylor, William J.
c266dec7-c5c5-4122-9562-56dc353e56b2
Lord, Susan
d00fbe85-23be-4154-bcd4-24d3f8920f00
McPherson, Kathryn M.
2bed96fc-b975-43aa-9e58-03f187c6e747
McNaughton, Harry K.
bc7770ae-1ba1-463d-8076-b0ee9d208236
Taylor, William J.
c266dec7-c5c5-4122-9562-56dc353e56b2
Lord, Susan
d00fbe85-23be-4154-bcd4-24d3f8920f00
McPherson, Kathryn M.
2bed96fc-b975-43aa-9e58-03f187c6e747
McNaughton, Harry K.
bc7770ae-1ba1-463d-8076-b0ee9d208236

Taylor, William J., Lord, Susan, McPherson, Kathryn M. and McNaughton, Harry K. (2001) EuroQol EQ-5D may not adequaltely describe the health of people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23 (7), 281 - 285. (doi:10.1080/096382801750143607).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether life-circumstances and factors other than those described in the EuroQol EQ-5D instrument have a systematic influence on how the same EuroQol health-state is valued. METHOD: A simulation exercise whereby health professionals were asked to rate the health-state of 16 case-scenarios. Each case-scenario was designed to describe the same EuroQol health-state but was varied systematically using a 4 by 2 factorial design, in terms of ability to work, ability to perform usual leisure activity, age and type of disability. A convenience sample of 41 health professionals studying towards a postgraduate Diploma in Rehabilitation formed the study group. RESULTS: The average valuation was significantly higher than that derived from a social tariff model. The following factors contributed to a model which explained 10% of the variability in valuation scores: characteristics of the assessor--years of experience, experience with musculoskeletal disorders, and characteristics of the scenario--disability type, ability to work and ability to perform usual leisure activities (beta weights ranged from 0.093 to 0.253). Ability to perform usual leisure activities was associated with the greatest influence on the valuation rating. Additionally, professional type had a significant influence on rating with general practitioners giving significantly lower valuations. CONCLUSIONS: The same health-state, as defined by EuroQol EQ-5D cannot be regarded as describing similar life-circumstances, sufficient to be valued in the same way. Factors specific to the 'valuer' (experience and professional type) and specific to the 'valuee' (disability type, ability to work or perform usual leisure activities) that are not included in the EQ-5D description are significantly associated with different valuation scores. Caution should be used in applying valuations obtained from social tariff models to a disabled population

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: health, disabilities, disability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 18077
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18077
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: 7ce78836-b7af-4a1b-ae92-419a06eed6f5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Nov 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: William J. Taylor
Author: Susan Lord
Author: Kathryn M. McPherson
Author: Harry K. McNaughton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×