The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study

Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
Objectives: To investigate reactions to the use of evidence-based cardiovascular and stroke performance indicators within one primary care group.

Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews.

Setting: Fifteen practices from a primary care group in southern England.

Participants: Fifty two primary health care professionals including 29 general practitioners, 11 practice managers, and 12 practice nurses.

Main outcome measures: Participants’ perceptions towards and actions made in response to these indicators. The barriers and facilitators in using these indicators to change practice.

Results: Barriers to the use of the indicators were their data quality and their technical specifications, including definitions of diseases such as heart failure and the threshold for interventions such as blood pressure control. Nevertheless, the indicators were sufficiently credible to prompt most of those in primary care teams to reflect on some aspect of their performance. The most common response was to improve data quality through increased or improved accuracy of recording. There was a lack of a coordinated team approach to decision making. Primary care teams placed little importance on the potential for performance indicators to identify and address inequalities in services between practices. The most common barrier to change was a lack of time and resources to act upon indicators.

Conclusion: For the effective implementation of national performance indicators there are many barriers to overcome at individual, practice, and primary care group levels. Additional training and resources are required for improvements in data quality and collection, further education of all members of primary care teams, and measures to foster organisational development within practices. Unless these barriers are addressed, performance indicators could initially increase apparent variation between practices.
performance indicators, primary care, primary care groups, training
0963-8172
166-174
Wilkinson, Emma K.
7596440d-44f5-4e4b-a3b3-9e4c0a9e9460
McColl, Alastair
d1d3bc6b-2a2c-41ca-9e5b-e0c0f8161321
Exworthy, Mark
311d398e-54ae-4f78-8a83-3b74455a5565
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Smith, Helen
e9ebdc59-6964-49b5-a2cd-b76d58ab77e1
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Gabbay, John
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a
Wilkinson, Emma K.
7596440d-44f5-4e4b-a3b3-9e4c0a9e9460
McColl, Alastair
d1d3bc6b-2a2c-41ca-9e5b-e0c0f8161321
Exworthy, Mark
311d398e-54ae-4f78-8a83-3b74455a5565
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Smith, Helen
e9ebdc59-6964-49b5-a2cd-b76d58ab77e1
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Gabbay, John
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a

Wilkinson, Emma K., McColl, Alastair, Exworthy, Mark, Roderick, Paul, Smith, Helen, Moore, Michael and Gabbay, John (2000) Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study. Quality in Health Care, 9 (3), 166-174. (doi:10.1136/qhc.9.3.166). (PMID:10980077)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate reactions to the use of evidence-based cardiovascular and stroke performance indicators within one primary care group.

Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews.

Setting: Fifteen practices from a primary care group in southern England.

Participants: Fifty two primary health care professionals including 29 general practitioners, 11 practice managers, and 12 practice nurses.

Main outcome measures: Participants’ perceptions towards and actions made in response to these indicators. The barriers and facilitators in using these indicators to change practice.

Results: Barriers to the use of the indicators were their data quality and their technical specifications, including definitions of diseases such as heart failure and the threshold for interventions such as blood pressure control. Nevertheless, the indicators were sufficiently credible to prompt most of those in primary care teams to reflect on some aspect of their performance. The most common response was to improve data quality through increased or improved accuracy of recording. There was a lack of a coordinated team approach to decision making. Primary care teams placed little importance on the potential for performance indicators to identify and address inequalities in services between practices. The most common barrier to change was a lack of time and resources to act upon indicators.

Conclusion: For the effective implementation of national performance indicators there are many barriers to overcome at individual, practice, and primary care group levels. Additional training and resources are required for improvements in data quality and collection, further education of all members of primary care teams, and measures to foster organisational development within practices. Unless these barriers are addressed, performance indicators could initially increase apparent variation between practices.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2000
Keywords: performance indicators, primary care, primary care groups, training

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 181675
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181675
ISSN: 0963-8172
PURE UUID: 6c88b2dc-4938-4673-93b9-d0c71dffbbc1
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2011 12:44
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma K. Wilkinson
Author: Alastair McColl
Author: Mark Exworthy
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Helen Smith
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD
Author: John Gabbay

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×