The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study

Wilkinson, Emma K., McColl, Alastair, Exworthy, Mark, Roderick, Paul, Smith, Helen, Moore, Michael and Gabbay, John (2000) Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study Quality in Health Care, 9, (3), pp. 166-174. (doi:10.1136/qhc.9.3.166). (PMID:10980077).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate reactions to the
use of evidence-based cardiovascular and
stroke performance indicators within one
primary care group.

Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured
interviews.

Setting: Fifteen practices from a primary
care group in southern England.

Participants: Fifty two primary health
care professionals including 29 general
practitioners, 11 practice managers, and
12 practice nurses.

Main outcome measures: Participants’
perceptions towards and actions made in
response to these indicators. The barriers
and facilitators in using these indicators
to change practice.

Results: Barriers to the use of the indicators were their data quality and their technical specifications, including definitions of diseases such as heart failure and the threshold for interventions such as blood pressure control. Nevertheless, the indicators were sufficiently credible to
prompt most of those in primary care teams to reflect on some aspect of their performance. The most common response
was to improve data quality through increased or improved accuracy of recording. There was a lack of a coordinated team approach to decision making. Primary care teams placed little importance on the potential for performance indicators to identify and address inequalities in services between practices. The most common barrier to change was a lack of time and resources to act upon
indicators.

Conclusion: For the effective implementation of national performance indicators there are many barriers to overcome at individual, practice, and primary care group levels. Additional training and resources are required for improvements in data quality and collection, further education of all members of primary care
teams, and measures to foster organisational
development within practices. Unless these barriers are addressed, performance indicators could initially
increase apparent variation between practices.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: September 2000
Keywords: performance indicators, primary care, primary care groups, training

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 181675
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181675
ISSN: 0963-8172
PURE UUID: 6c88b2dc-4938-4673-93b9-d0c71dffbbc1
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2011 12:44
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma K. Wilkinson
Author: Alastair McColl
Author: Mark Exworthy
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Helen Smith
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD
Author: John Gabbay

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×