Teaching children with autism using conditioned cue-value and response-marking procedures: a socially valid procedure
Teaching children with autism using conditioned cue-value and response-marking procedures: a socially valid procedure
Five children with autism were taught to match printed words to corresponding pictures. Participants’ speed of learning was compared across three training conditions, each involving a 5-s delay of reinforcement, using a within-participants alternating treatments design. In the cue-value condition, a verbal phrase of approval (e.g., "good!") was delivered only after correct responses and again after a 5-s delay when a primary reinforcer was delivered; in the response-marking condition, an attention-eliciting verbal cue (e.g., "look!") was delivered after both correct and incorrect responses, but not prior to the primary reinforcer; in the delay only condition, there were no cues during a 5-s delay. Performance in the no-cue control was inferior to both the cue-value and response-marking conditions, but there was little difference between the latter two conditions. The implications of these results for facilitating learning in applied settings are discussed.
conditioned reinforcement, cue value, response marking, discrete-trial training, autistic children
413-429
Grindle, Corinna F.
414db7cf-d343-4848-81c1-f6d2f92e77b1
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
September 2004
Grindle, Corinna F.
414db7cf-d343-4848-81c1-f6d2f92e77b1
Remington, Bob
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Grindle, Corinna F. and Remington, Bob
(2004)
Teaching children with autism using conditioned cue-value and response-marking procedures: a socially valid procedure.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25 (5), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2003.09.003).
Abstract
Five children with autism were taught to match printed words to corresponding pictures. Participants’ speed of learning was compared across three training conditions, each involving a 5-s delay of reinforcement, using a within-participants alternating treatments design. In the cue-value condition, a verbal phrase of approval (e.g., "good!") was delivered only after correct responses and again after a 5-s delay when a primary reinforcer was delivered; in the response-marking condition, an attention-eliciting verbal cue (e.g., "look!") was delivered after both correct and incorrect responses, but not prior to the primary reinforcer; in the delay only condition, there were no cues during a 5-s delay. Performance in the no-cue control was inferior to both the cue-value and response-marking conditions, but there was little difference between the latter two conditions. The implications of these results for facilitating learning in applied settings are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: September 2004
Keywords:
conditioned reinforcement, cue value, response marking, discrete-trial training, autistic children
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18206
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18206
ISSN: 0891-4222
PURE UUID: 2cf37033-ab83-4e00-84fe-4802058ef990
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Jan 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Corinna F. Grindle
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics