Pancultural self-enhancement
Pancultural self-enhancement
The culture movement challenged the universality of the self-enhancement motive by proposing that the motive is pervasive in individualistic cultures (the West) but absent in collectivistic cultures (the East). The present research posited that Westerners and Easterners use different tactics to achieve the same goal: positive self-regard. Study 1 tested participants from differing cultural backgrounds (the United States vs. Japan), and Study 2 tested participants of differing self-construals (independent vs. interdependent). Americans and independents self-enhanced on individualistic attributes, whereas Japanese and interdependents self-enhanced on collectivistic attributes. Independents regarded individualistic attributes, whereas interdependents regarded collectivistic attributes, as personally important. Attribute importance mediated self-enhancement. Regardless of cultural background or self-construal, people self-enhance on personally important dimensions. Self-enhancement is a universal human motive.
60-79
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, Lowell
94e37daf-7d1b-431e-9df3-efad4f0bc91c
Toguchi, Yoshiyasu
9c8692d7-af02-421a-88cc-a0354e0ae777
2003
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gaertner, Lowell
94e37daf-7d1b-431e-9df3-efad4f0bc91c
Toguchi, Yoshiyasu
9c8692d7-af02-421a-88cc-a0354e0ae777
Sedikides, Constantine, Gaertner, Lowell and Toguchi, Yoshiyasu
(2003)
Pancultural self-enhancement.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (1), .
(doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60).
Abstract
The culture movement challenged the universality of the self-enhancement motive by proposing that the motive is pervasive in individualistic cultures (the West) but absent in collectivistic cultures (the East). The present research posited that Westerners and Easterners use different tactics to achieve the same goal: positive self-regard. Study 1 tested participants from differing cultural backgrounds (the United States vs. Japan), and Study 2 tested participants of differing self-construals (independent vs. interdependent). Americans and independents self-enhanced on individualistic attributes, whereas Japanese and interdependents self-enhanced on collectivistic attributes. Independents regarded individualistic attributes, whereas interdependents regarded collectivistic attributes, as personally important. Attribute importance mediated self-enhancement. Regardless of cultural background or self-construal, people self-enhance on personally important dimensions. Self-enhancement is a universal human motive.
Text
00005205-200301000-00005.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2003
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18238
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18238
ISSN: 0022-3514
PURE UUID: e95512b1-35c3-43df-adfd-3093b77b6b03
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Jan 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lowell Gaertner
Author:
Yoshiyasu Toguchi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics