Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders
Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders
The objective of this study is to describe researchers', health-care providers' and other stakeholders' views of ethical review and research governance procedures. The study design involved qualitative semi-structured interviews. Participants included 60 individuals who either undertook research in the subspecialty of cancer genetics (n = 40) or were involved in biomedical research in other capacities (n = 20), e.g. research governance and oversight, patient support groups or research funding. While all interviewees observed that oversight is necessary to protect research participants, ethical review and research governance (ERG) arrangements were described negatively throughout these interviews. Interviewees identified a number of problems with ERG, including: over-bureaucratization, over-standardization of information requirements for different types of research, a lack of standardization in the types of information required by different committees for the same research and a lack of consistency in different committees' responses. A number of solutions were proposed including streamlining application procedures and harmonizing committees' responses and information requirements. Recent reports suggest that ethical review procedures and research governance arrangements threaten the possibility of undertaking clinical research in the UK, hence the introduction of the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) is long overdue. However, while IRAS may solve some of the problems identified by interviewees, it remains to be seen to what extent it will impact upon the very negative perceptions of ethics and research governance procedures reported here.
85-90
Hallowell, Nina
671cbd1f-fb44-40bc-86eb-be2b1d4d73ed
Cooke, Sarah
c5e8adab-bade-4801-95f2-70d37b013d5e
Crawford, Gillian
c49ec103-2936-4897-8f25-96abe25b3a9f
Parker, Michael
f08fdd2b-3c14-472f-b222-0ced5bb71bd4
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
June 2008
Hallowell, Nina
671cbd1f-fb44-40bc-86eb-be2b1d4d73ed
Cooke, Sarah
c5e8adab-bade-4801-95f2-70d37b013d5e
Crawford, Gillian
c49ec103-2936-4897-8f25-96abe25b3a9f
Parker, Michael
f08fdd2b-3c14-472f-b222-0ced5bb71bd4
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Hallowell, Nina, Cooke, Sarah, Crawford, Gillian, Parker, Michael and Lucassen, Anneke
(2008)
Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders.
Clinical Ethics, 3 (2), .
(doi:10.1258/ce.2008.008014).
Abstract
The objective of this study is to describe researchers', health-care providers' and other stakeholders' views of ethical review and research governance procedures. The study design involved qualitative semi-structured interviews. Participants included 60 individuals who either undertook research in the subspecialty of cancer genetics (n = 40) or were involved in biomedical research in other capacities (n = 20), e.g. research governance and oversight, patient support groups or research funding. While all interviewees observed that oversight is necessary to protect research participants, ethical review and research governance (ERG) arrangements were described negatively throughout these interviews. Interviewees identified a number of problems with ERG, including: over-bureaucratization, over-standardization of information requirements for different types of research, a lack of standardization in the types of information required by different committees for the same research and a lack of consistency in different committees' responses. A number of solutions were proposed including streamlining application procedures and harmonizing committees' responses and information requirements. Recent reports suggest that ethical review procedures and research governance arrangements threaten the possibility of undertaking clinical research in the UK, hence the introduction of the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) is long overdue. However, while IRAS may solve some of the problems identified by interviewees, it remains to be seen to what extent it will impact upon the very negative perceptions of ethics and research governance procedures reported here.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 182515
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/182515
ISSN: 1477-7509
PURE UUID: 9daf6cd4-62e9-4a48-b6be-f9929e8ae8de
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Apr 2011 16:43
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nina Hallowell
Author:
Sarah Cooke
Author:
Michael Parker
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics