The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders

Hallowell, Nina, Cooke, Sarah, Crawford, Gillian, Parker, Michael and Lucassen, Anneke (2008) Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders Clinical Ethics, 3, (2), pp. 85-90. (doi:10.1258/ce.2008.008014).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe researchers', health-care providers' and other stakeholders' views of ethical review and research governance procedures. The study design involved qualitative semi-structured interviews. Participants included 60 individuals who either undertook research in the subspecialty of cancer genetics (n = 40) or were involved in biomedical research in other capacities (n = 20), e.g. research governance and oversight, patient support groups or research funding. While all interviewees observed that oversight is necessary to protect research participants, ethical review and research governance (ERG) arrangements were described negatively throughout these interviews. Interviewees identified a number of problems with ERG, including: over-bureaucratization, over-standardization of information requirements for different types of research, a lack of standardization in the types of information required by different committees for the same research and a lack of consistency in different committees' responses. A number of solutions were proposed including streamlining application procedures and harmonizing committees' responses and information requirements. Recent reports suggest that ethical review procedures and research governance arrangements threaten the possibility of undertaking clinical research in the UK, hence the introduction of the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) is long overdue. However, while IRAS may solve some of the problems identified by interviewees, it remains to be seen to what extent it will impact upon the very negative perceptions of ethics and research governance procedures reported here.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: June 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 182515
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/182515
ISSN: 1477-7509
PURE UUID: 9daf6cd4-62e9-4a48-b6be-f9929e8ae8de

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2011 16:43
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 11:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nina Hallowell
Author: Sarah Cooke
Author: Michael Parker
Author: Anneke Lucassen

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×