The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

House of Lords Reform Since 1911: Must the Lords Go?

House of Lords Reform Since 1911: Must the Lords Go?
House of Lords Reform Since 1911: Must the Lords Go?
In 1911, the power of the House of Lords was curbed, as a prelude to establishing a more democratic Second Chamber. A century later, the House of Lords is still comprised mostly of appointed peers, with some hereditary peers remaining. This book explains why House of Lords reform has proceeded so erratically since 1911, and why an elected Second Chamber has still not been established 100 years later. Using a range of primary sources, including Cabinet papers, Ministerial correspondence, the archives of the main political parties and the private papers of various key political figures, this unique study traces the main proposals for reform of the Second Chamber during the last 100 years, and notes that even the apparently simplest measures have raised complex or constitutionally awkward problems when exposed to fuller discussion and examination. Furthermore, the issue of House of Lords reform has not only repeatedly revealed disagreements between the main parties, but also marked differences within them, which have exacerbated the problems of securing agreement on proposals for reform.

9780230271661
Palgrave Macmillan
Dorey, Peter
4a15178f-cfda-4c0e-b197-046c4074af94
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096
Dorey, Peter
4a15178f-cfda-4c0e-b197-046c4074af94
Kelso, Alexandra
e9f198bb-27f8-412a-9360-aff01d578096

Dorey, Peter and Kelso, Alexandra (2011) House of Lords Reform Since 1911: Must the Lords Go? , Basingstoke, GB. Palgrave Macmillan, 256pp.

Record type: Book

Abstract

In 1911, the power of the House of Lords was curbed, as a prelude to establishing a more democratic Second Chamber. A century later, the House of Lords is still comprised mostly of appointed peers, with some hereditary peers remaining. This book explains why House of Lords reform has proceeded so erratically since 1911, and why an elected Second Chamber has still not been established 100 years later. Using a range of primary sources, including Cabinet papers, Ministerial correspondence, the archives of the main political parties and the private papers of various key political figures, this unique study traces the main proposals for reform of the Second Chamber during the last 100 years, and notes that even the apparently simplest measures have raised complex or constitutionally awkward problems when exposed to fuller discussion and examination. Furthermore, the issue of House of Lords reform has not only repeatedly revealed disagreements between the main parties, but also marked differences within them, which have exacerbated the problems of securing agreement on proposals for reform.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 April 2011
Organisations: Politics & International Relations

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 182989
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/182989
ISBN: 9780230271661
PURE UUID: 8895df1f-006d-4180-a067-c3fcf3e9a2b3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Apr 2011 13:18
Last modified: 05 Aug 2022 16:36

Export record

Contributors

Author: Peter Dorey
Author: Alexandra Kelso

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×