Generation failure: estimating metacognition in cued recall
Generation failure: estimating metacognition in cued recall
Three experiments examined generation, recognition, and response bias in the original encoding-specificity paradigm using the type 2 signal-detection analysis advocated by Higham (2002). Experiments 1 (pure-list design) and 2 (mixed-list design) indicated that some guidance regarding the strength of the associative relationship between the test cue and target greatly improved strong-cue target production relative to no guidance, and that this effect was attributable to improved generation, as well as recognition. Problems with generating candidates for response during standard cued recall was further shown in Experiment 3, where despite having the opportunity to provide multiple responses for each cue, participants’ ability to produce the targets remained poor. The results are discussed in terms of traditional and modern generate-recognize theory, metacognition, and dual-route models of recall.
cued recall, generate-recognize, metacognition, encoding specificity
595-617
Higham, Philip A.
4093b28f-7d58-4d18-89d4-021792e418e7
Tam, Helen
26d64b93-dca0-4547-b9ca-ccc387073da0
2005
Higham, Philip A.
4093b28f-7d58-4d18-89d4-021792e418e7
Tam, Helen
26d64b93-dca0-4547-b9ca-ccc387073da0
Higham, Philip A. and Tam, Helen
(2005)
Generation failure: estimating metacognition in cued recall.
[in special issue: Metamemory]
Journal of Memory and Language, 52 (4), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.015).
Abstract
Three experiments examined generation, recognition, and response bias in the original encoding-specificity paradigm using the type 2 signal-detection analysis advocated by Higham (2002). Experiments 1 (pure-list design) and 2 (mixed-list design) indicated that some guidance regarding the strength of the associative relationship between the test cue and target greatly improved strong-cue target production relative to no guidance, and that this effect was attributable to improved generation, as well as recognition. Problems with generating candidates for response during standard cued recall was further shown in Experiment 3, where despite having the opportunity to provide multiple responses for each cue, participants’ ability to produce the targets remained poor. The results are discussed in terms of traditional and modern generate-recognize theory, metacognition, and dual-route models of recall.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Keywords:
cued recall, generate-recognize, metacognition, encoding specificity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 18328
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/18328
ISSN: 0749-596X
PURE UUID: f98f5796-ab91-47d1-bcf8-a1957188d68b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jan 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Helen Tam
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics